Subject: Re: [PATCH] HP mobile data protection system driver
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Burman Yan <yan_952@hotmail.com>
Cc: davej@redhat.com, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       pazke@donpac.ru
In-Reply-To: <BAY20-F21743EEAB4B44BD437AE68D80A0@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY20-F21743EEAB4B44BD437AE68D80A0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Intel International BV
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:25:02 +0200
Message-Id: <1160756702.14815.1.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 982
Lines: 27


> That would probably mean that there is a need for single interface. 

yes please

> Making 
> all accelerometers
> export to /sys/devices/platform/hdaps sounds wrong to me. It should be a 
> neutral place then.

well.... breaking stuff for no reason other than "but it sounds like HIS
name" is I thing bad. Yes the name is unfortunate, but if you can use
the interface... why not? Just because the name isn't perfect everyone
should change over, including keeping compatibility mess etc etc?
That needs a stronger reason than "it sounds like his name" to me...

Now if the interface itself isn't good enough, that's a different matter
of course; but from what I read so far that's not really the case.

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/