Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp963796pxb; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:11:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7l9COJQ0JVv1MKMEyXdZZOTSs0nN9tg0HdBjKq9dtBaHsz7WhINqzDGX5hSDPx9yNwl/J X-Received: by 2002:a63:c4f:: with SMTP id 15mr21053845pgm.379.1618135889599; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:11:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618135889; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OwckfBHljZcALmGnoDAaVmHR1tZW6wK+D8s8xkb7WCjWP/jEnqu9RG9Km0JToV6hsL mTHiUgyQsBN2BcdG/uZNUz+EvuzygP5OUwfs6eDy0+5LVqEbQrfwF1mLVucSbjOitsNa 1x5zDXB1hmKQEcQEs/ZiGBXaN0mSGTEBvZAc5/Y9C1BmGQt/gpsuwB5JuKwtM6j4ZVoo PSA8VL7EYydTnvD7qQKxdvPmwKV5tAdnnVnFExKOXCpuJu8rcY8UEoi41VMpH33pPCxL 904r/7OepYZOP3kngLcE1CgF98/YKwmdrdI4u1PnNfnB4nsHDaZjEaQIUkcSJ3zlciNz v9iA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=A/6T0398LQqNvWO3s9cDPZCeJkr2Z0HYiE0qqXBj9SI=; b=CF5MynsGZGT8J3zLjn1pSiD4R/dMA5pIxn9LoKFu70mQGaRcuZ+1teRlsnvpt1WJZR ofKcn7lYdQrz7G86xFEpsQDtxB91U25keQSZ9RP6lPICI3f7OhexNg1HSGfC/gmVOjSd d6nVJbv3KHA6IbI3SEKv4ZjwAAow52JAbx7PnqvFbhgQRJ+UjQkyT/7HRfhIwQDRv5Ys R0uYZ+9OVn6bCb5VCDXP3pJBBrE14v7QLfaaRl1ZXjjrTsFPlCeSizSbJAoBBIqbVS3r TN01CGETtZTEc9374jD0/DsVSDdxdivBO/fNOt/S6KtXbFc1iJjL4tCFYNKxwICGkVUH JyvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="UOm/fIL1"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u14si8643599pgm.108.2021.04.11.03.11.16; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 03:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="UOm/fIL1"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235287AbhDKJcT (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 11 Apr 2021 05:32:19 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:32982 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235005AbhDKJcS (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Apr 2021 05:32:18 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 012C0610E9; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:32:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1618133522; bh=hHupB1eLGwjzMyzVCQyKhi+SnTMbneghjDlPD7+s43w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UOm/fIL1owj9+eeGLJOMYAAsUBLjDzNbFApOnRvT0wN1TmBCyAQLI3woIxJW7X0/I JbcLQ0Y6kQB5lAgcuwNO3rNfO/q6tFEtC8Y9LjYfUt3Uffk5tq+PPRNttLOdFvGD0w +EkUP111m/uJ0JHuFW/0XtQAzPQrmE2e76PFxNLwtJK9wgBFWHBBQ9RT74LM7OlsVi o13IG5iSmPBLJJdU50J7SnEzpjiANVc0suXDp8lWdkCCFQwNkDbU7c7f0ogJRSwBzg TgOU/brjYOLkLJYzfsWbq95hhNw7w9P1RLhOwK7hzELhoGYbGVSqCkLOt4etjsAbhI ayvLfTvy+B+Og== Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:31:58 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Raphael Norwitz Cc: "bhelgaas@google.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "ameynarkhede03@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: merge slot and bus reset implementations Message-ID: References: <20210408182328.12323-1-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210408182328.12323-1-raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:23:40PM +0000, Raphael Norwitz wrote: > Slot resets are bus resets with additional logic to prevent a device > from being removed during the reset. Currently slot and bus resets have > separate implementations in pci.c, complicating higher level logic. As > discussed on the mailing list, they should be combined into a generic > function which performs an SBR. This change adds a function, > pci_reset_bus_function(), which first attempts a slot reset and then > attempts a bus reset if -ENOTTY is returned, such that there is now a > single device agnostic function to perform an SBR. > > This new function is also needed to add SBR reset quirks and therefore > is exposed in pci.h. > > Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/3/23/911 > > Suggested-by: Alex Williamson > Signed-off-by: Amey Narkhede > Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz > --- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- > include/linux/pci.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > Thanks, Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky