Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751437AbWJMRfL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:35:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751401AbWJMRfL (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:35:11 -0400 Received: from outbound0.mx.meer.net ([209.157.153.23]:63236 "EHLO outbound0.sv.meer.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751437AbWJMRfJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:35:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] process filtering for fault-injection capabilities From: Don Mullis To: Akinobu Mita Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <452df238.04819267.55ff.ffffd8a2@mx.google.com> References: <20061012074305.047696736@gmail.com> > <452df238.04819267.55ff.ffffd8a2@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:28:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1160760534.31851.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 (2.6.3-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1525 Lines: 41 On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:43 +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: > This patch provides process filtering feature. > The process filter allows failing only permitted processes > by /proc//make-it-fail Akinobu: Toward the end of the previous round of review, we had the following exchange: On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 17:05 +0800, Akinobu Mita wrote: On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:54:51PM -0700, Don Mullis wrote: > > Add functionality to the process_filter variable: A negative argument > > injects failures for only for pid==-process_filter, thereby permitting > > per-process failures from boot time. > > > > Is it better to add new filter for this purpose? > Because someone may want to filter by tgid instead of pid. > > - positive value is for task->pid > - nevative value is for task->tgid Your idea sounds good to me. So naturally I'm wondering why the functionality was dropped. An application I had in mind was to identify which of the boot-time calls to the slab allocator must not fail but are not yet marked __GFP_NOFAIL (some experimentation showed that for pid 1 there are lots of these). Andrew: Would such an exercise would be worth the effort? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/