Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp1533704pxb; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:39:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNkvgsVeJq3b0HrfV8C6Krn4fX35nguelw0Zwz3VRNkI2DgbFx9/sKdlrl1zT2Vy8YZmIz X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4004:: with SMTP id v4mr26143298ejj.208.1618209579149; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:39:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618209579; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=asMoLdXHzZoPHrL0rdOh+GCvhSeRirXeyAYi0xUugaPofkzVS7dS0YUKNPRwZPGsql IuMOSXGP3eDmfvUr288qo9GwEmGUrJxRq+YEO79wscIccG3eWG16y3TKmBqVuY+SOGCc xZ80cPGox1LScHxa00l3bMwNSNPYjfMINOsIPbNkxKcPpp2f0Svw9uWJXw2n15lw7dS2 U7nt3smyZG4TR/3AZA5ZCkeQEwonOVnGRtwt41f6lQ5hZJu9tfoFV157wFe3MaK/cGxr c474Kzjk+37O7J2MMy6W/9geW8PZ3xmfRMKG+snq8X9XdEG/kq9XT76n5Rl79R7U2Sz/ k5kg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject:dkim-signature; bh=O4EBv0iM8QkeGxL9/hee8qNtWhBLhiqd7BzISi5se0s=; b=KYGwUH/Gc21XyTzWL5HTc/El1bixj/SUby8U/T1lWxWmKIMB1tQzYJOACBJZAbqX+f b1SZMtGsHpN9ZkA4wwAPBledKWW5H1/ItFGkAY1Dh2HD2PS3ytBODSQFZcHUIFpU+r81 aVn2Oxq4p9Ime70IqLvp35EQ3Baa1uFksVrBBrKjGfa+6OXtBxlA0LXF3h6Nhoihpsil 9Ngt1h+w79EAJXUfrJOCubP2y5VY57eXuaMAA6rbA4UuvTNUK3n3qVNsRW+2T0smnr8F ia1uktOUru6tIJKz2N9UjHpVDzj2HCR9WSeiSFky+7fGZTEcgoyXolUI7XKco99xoVT4 4Lww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UcokLmqi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si6906351edu.503.2021.04.11.23.39.13; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UcokLmqi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229666AbhDLGfk (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:35:40 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:51744 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229461AbhDLGfj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:35:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618209321; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O4EBv0iM8QkeGxL9/hee8qNtWhBLhiqd7BzISi5se0s=; b=UcokLmqiJHipSpGzAe664bZluxogidWVPpcn6eioBsAuXi5yyj05tYX7tiM8pSjZhFfVDa zDSwR8ql88QuaVmk2qfMgo2Rw1LmZz6ULPwwaBl6shWmEkMWIbRjdwrjNC5uxRd/hOmfPK GeOEx16yYEbht2CCtxSb2DPCJg/JkMI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-188-ldkqjGUtMEGBC1_Pt9LsKA-1; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:35:15 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ldkqjGUtMEGBC1_Pt9LsKA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF52510054F6; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wangxiaodeMacBook-Air.local (ovpn-13-232.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.232]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE141A86A; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vdpa: mandate 1.0 device To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parav@nvidia.com, elic@nvidia.com References: <20210408082648.20145-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20210408115834-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20210409115343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <42891807-cb24-5352-f8cb-798e9d1a1854@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:35:07 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210409115343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2021/4/10 上午12:04, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:47:55PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> 在 2021/4/8 下午11:59, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道: >>> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:26:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> This patch mandates 1.0 for vDPA devices. The goal is to have the >>>> semantic of normative statement in the virtio spec and eliminate the >>>> burden of transitional device for both vDPA bus and vDPA parent. >>>> >>>> uAPI seems fine since all the vDPA parent mandates >>>> VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM which implies 1.0 devices. >>>> >>>> For legacy guests, it can still work since Qemu will mediate when >>>> necessary (e.g doing the endian conversion). >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang >>> Hmm. If we do this, don't we still have a problem with >>> legacy drivers which don't ack 1.0? >> >> Yes, but it's not something that is introduced in this commit. The legacy >> driver never work ... > My point is this neither fixes or prevents this. > > So my suggestion is to finally add ioctls along the lines > of PROTOCOL_FEATURES of vhost-user. > > Then that one can have bits for legacy le, legacy be and modern. > > BTW I looked at vhost-user and it does not look like that > has a solution for this problem either, right? Right. > > >>> Note 1.0 affects ring endianness which is not mediated in QEMU >>> so QEMU can't pretend to device guest is 1.0. >> >> Right, I plan to send patches to do mediation in the Qemu to unbreak legacy >> drivers. >> >> Thanks > I frankly think we'll need PROTOCOL_FEATURES anyway, it's too useful ... > so why not teach drivers about it and be done with it? You can't emulate > legacy on modern in a cross endian situation because of vring > endian-ness ... So the problem still. This can only work when the hardware can support legacy vring endian-ness. Consider: 1) the leagcy driver support is non-normative in the spec 2) support a transitional device in the kenrel may requires the hardware support and a burden of kernel codes I'd rather simply drop the legacy driver support to have a simple and easy abstarction in the kenrel. For legacy driver in the guest, hypervisor is in charge of the mediation: 1) config space access endian conversion 2) using shadow virtqueue to change the endian in the vring Thanks > > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> --- >>>> include/linux/vdpa.h | 6 ++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h >>>> index 0fefeb976877..cfde4ec999b4 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h >>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> #include >>>> +#include >>>> /** >>>> * vDPA callback definition. >>>> @@ -317,6 +318,11 @@ static inline int vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features) >>>> { >>>> const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config; >>>> + /* Mandating 1.0 to have semantics of normative statements in >>>> + * the spec. */ >>>> + if (!(features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))) >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + >>>> vdev->features_valid = true; >>>> return ops->set_features(vdev, features); >>>> } >>>> -- >>>> 2.25.1