Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S278492AbRKHVnt>; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:43:49 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S278592AbRKHVn3>; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:43:29 -0500
Received: from pa160.grajewo.sdi.tpnet.pl ([217.96.134.160]:33922 "HELO
	pa160.grajewo.sdi.tpnet.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S278591AbRKHVnZ>; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:43:25 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gniazdowski <refuse7@poczta.fm>
Reply-To: refuse7@poczta.fm
Organization: none
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any lingering Athlon bugs in Kernel 2.4.14?
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 22:50:28 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111081315500.4578-100000@rtlab.med.cornell.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111081315500.4578-100000@rtlab.med.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <20011108215029.3740C2218C@pa160.grajewo.sdi.tpnet.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> older VM, or does it try to address Athlon bugs more aggressively? Ie: Why

Athlon have bugs ?!
Or are we talking about Athlon-optimizations bugs ? Or about Athlon SMP ?

Regards Gniazdowski Mariusz.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/