Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 192/210] lockdep: Address clang -Wformat warning printing for %hd
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:41:37 +0200
Message-Id: <20210412084022.410153507@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210412084016.009884719@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20210412084016.009884719@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

commit 6d48b7912cc72275dc7c59ff961c8bac7ef66a92 upstream.

Clang doesn't like format strings that truncate a 32-bit
value to something shorter:

  kernel/locking/lockdep.c:709:4: error: format specifies type 'short' but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]

In this case, the warning is a slightly questionable, as it could realize
that both class->wait_type_outer and class->wait_type_inner are in fact
8-bit struct members, even though the result of the ?: operator becomes an
'int'.

However, there is really no point in printing the number as a 16-bit
'short' rather than either an 8-bit or 32-bit number, so just change
it to a normal %d.

Fixes: de8f5e4f2dc1 ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210322115531.3987555-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static void print_lock_name(struct lock_
 
 	printk(KERN_CONT " (");
 	__print_lock_name(class);
-	printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%hd:%hd}", usage,
+	printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%d:%d}", usage,
 			class->wait_type_outer ?: class->wait_type_inner,
 			class->wait_type_inner);
 }