Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp1629690pxb; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:53:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziaizIsfsi4Csd4DYBtPmW+mi49aoQYkiPWqjTk3G+jxl4KHAjxddsQZjjEbLOBmDNOjB7 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d3c8:: with SMTP id o8mr28910233edr.289.1618221186908; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:53:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618221186; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ipyTVrWTfaWCFQ+TyTc50BMHrK5T8PqbUOy+f9GyjJyWg9AFp1HCvF+x9XbT9siolC qacb/IQnHc9myCwUFMr114MKHVNw+SH+PfMsYxnZdwQickktcFnlNlq1rIWaTkPQblF/ FLuhQBzgVJRCDuA7hWYPs3LilNTurUmCvIYy1koG87eM3h27xeJqGEzp41otAMl5JwCM ZJecXWINi8RhGji+cs/mXzBJwtC2tk1Og+pBPXBbxe0s0F2CybMYmehgb4vRdyFADdM2 ywhb2ipVOibxMpiQ4nWqQIhxjOfHnd7S6F/yoV24lXgAc78Dsh5/LZ99hBbcDu7jwWky w0VQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=vyyVMhLZ7feBe6qZUuGKY3//3kGK5fNGkkKSQXjobIc=; b=RUj5ZSS5Cto0po+vFKYdRtLH9Vq+ANXfPnb2VFNma51FMlzszmllL6R7D6VywpjxzX x1JYIcp5BS8/s6w3RL32LHFOFhsrgw/cVSTmdlOqeJ3WPWqjao9UGifJODj5lIaeFprH UgjPh7s47ww4Ztr0JbykKIVc7y8ZuLnSmwYNyhr2a40CcLmElm05gCeHdSfPamevQNTU XZT2xkSv1by/VRBLvZ1iTl9QEGPvpgXFZfY8X9cgNZgcen421qBT1zI/zFXkiTaDXnFK LSmDGPtaC8sV2gFoboMsXH4RAx2h+TJIGAEGlLU2Sa3m3V+0ImI0HRAX3pBXik9M89S0 YMAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=2gscKo63; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w9si6807858ejv.549.2021.04.12.02.52.32; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=2gscKo63; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241611AbhDLJqC (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:46:02 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49160 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241658AbhDLJal (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:30:41 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5138161209; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:30:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1618219823; bh=WaL4dBUXjfT8rASmI+q10qscE5UnuzaJkLoxDaL8/wc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=2gscKo63FYh/GFa1acBa/D+w92KL8kgaWb2QhFEBTlrXIOm5vulDcVbkBawwQ7Jk1 12zqUGcfb9O1gGGhAcWo8p4k36S4jumhF6BJVIJJ+NwAArGwYoxlGp97GchzvSIU+j 1Z6nCyFNEEGyMn5cHBk8Vu1hCDfobzHH6K/ANHBY= Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:30:21 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: tawahpeggy Cc: Ian Abbott , H Hartley Sweeten , outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: Remove line to fix checkpatch error Message-ID: References: <20210411204933.GA3524@peggy-Lenovo-V130-15IKB> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210411204933.GA3524@peggy-Lenovo-V130-15IKB> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 04:49:38PM -0400, tawahpeggy wrote: > remove one empty line.CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines > > Signed-off-by: tawahpeggy > > --- > drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_pcmcia.mod.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 0 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_pcmcia.mod.c > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_pcmcia.mod.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_pcmcia.mod.c > index 0904b8765afs96..3984db1a39c8 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_pcmcia.mod.c > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > #include > #define INCLUDE_VERMAGIC > #include > #include > #include > > BUILD_SALT; > > MODULE_INFO(vermagic, VERMAGIC_STRING); > MODULE_INFO(name, KBUILD_MODNAME); > > __visible struct module __this_module > __section(".gnu.linkonce.this_module") = { > .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > .init = init_module, > #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD > .exit = cleanup_module, > #endif > .arch = MODULE_ARCH_INIT, > }; > > #ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE > MODULE_INFO(retpoline, "Y"); > #endif > > MODULE_INFO(staging, "Y"); > > MODULE_INFO(depends, "pcmcia,comedi"); > > - > MODULE_INFO(srcversion, "ED971F2E01020DFA2B04486"); > -- > 2.17.1 Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch did many different things all at once, making it difficult to review. All Linux kernel patches need to only do one thing at a time. If you need to do multiple things (such as clean up all coding style issues in a file/driver), do it in a sequence of patches, each one doing only one thing. This will make it easier to review the patches to ensure that they are correct, and to help alleviate any merge issues that larger patches can cause. - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should look like. - It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to match). Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how to do this correctly. - Your patch does not match the description at all. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot