Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210409231842.8840-1-longman@redhat.com> <20210409231842.8840-2-longman@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210409231842.8840-2-longman@redhat.com>
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:22:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CALvZod4MSrvSBJv3Kd2VC42BxQFNRhPaeM8AbCXXbkGOTfjRig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/memcg: Pass both memcg and lruvec to mod_memcg_lruvec_state()
To:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
        Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 4:19 PM Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The caller of mod_memcg_lruvec_state() has both memcg and lruvec readily
> available. So both of them are now passed to mod_memcg_lruvec_state()
> and __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(). The __mod_memcg_lruvec_state() is
> updated to allow either of the two parameters to be set to null. This
> makes mod_memcg_lruvec_state() equivalent to mod_memcg_state() if lruvec
> is null.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

Similar to Roman's suggestion: instead of what this patch is doing the
'why' would be better in the changelog.

Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>