Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:24:56 +0200
From:   Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     joe@perches.com, julia.lawall@inria.fr,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cocci script hints request
Message-ID: <20210413092455.GB5477@agape.jhs>
References: <20210413090400.GA5477@agape.jhs>
 <YHVgSuRCW1fdabrH@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YHVgSuRCW1fdabrH@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:11:38AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:04:01AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I would like to improve the following coccinelle script:
> > 
> > @@
> > expression a, fmt;
> > expression list var_args;
> > @@
> > 
> > -       DBG_871X_LEVEL(a, fmt, var_args);
> > +       printk(fmt, var_args);
> > 
> > I would  replace the DBG_871X_LEVEL macro with printk,
> 
> No you really do not, you want to change that to a dev_*() call instead
> depending on the "level" of the message.
> 
> No "raw" printk() calls please, I will just reject them :)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

but there are very few occurences of DBG_871X_LEVEL in module init functions:

static int __init rtw_drv_entry(void)
{
        int ret;

        DBG_871X_LEVEL(_drv_always_, "module init start\n");
        dump_drv_version(RTW_DBGDUMP);
#ifdef BTCOEXVERSION
        DBG_871X_LEVEL(_drv_always_, "rtl8723bs BT-Coex version = %s\n", BTCOEXVERSION);
#endif /*  BTCOEXVERSION */

        sdio_drvpriv.drv_registered = true;

        ret = sdio_register_driver(&sdio_drvpriv.r871xs_drv);
        if (ret != 0) {
                sdio_drvpriv.drv_registered = false;
                rtw_ndev_notifier_unregister();
        }

        DBG_871X_LEVEL(_drv_always_, "module init ret =%d\n", ret);
        return ret;
}

where I don't have a device available... shall I pass NULL to
first argument?

Another question: may I use netdev_dbg in case of rtl8723bs?

thank you,

fabio