Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp3288088pxb; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:38:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVLUYQVhJ61CR23Xad0DurDW53NOvn8qY4G9HVVSAbETW8nDmhqKZM0uNBOOq70Tu5/UYc X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cf16:: with SMTP id a22mr40003569edy.267.1618389529036; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:38:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618389529; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GJgmBZo4T8Xdwba9iHYKYNw8IFZb35Ytu3Yt+Tv/pSy2e4/58dT61YPeO1cvjwwusW 2perJu3NT2S+A2uaIqsavdUOhdeM2dgBn+HD/gPCj4bj6ofA4lsymYKjcn1cYZgUgX/v bf7dz9wm5Y0N29AYODK+bcnzJqazsLHBJOIQv/dM+y76s9ZZeGEEwD7zd3RGnPdO7dH9 +DPNqTFueHkPv0Lq0iwiSm0jWlBNk5bfqDqrJOvKXByx207aGOknreTvsIRJixenK0cJ UBdNAb6oZ4YQGQ/AV2Qrxe0rnxxB1I9amtgNzVYOAgf/Ts/GYC+Y5O+OIjlQi5HqURHp +9yA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=FOllnPXHllv++nMeKGcRp72HvHtuzEorYNDS+7csQnc=; b=F6ihV0Po5yv6abZMwWdncZ+qr9K7juXMh+jGbW42XwYsiImsvIzapXeqt3hBePs9Nv 1zrh3208/hgndqGazP5cgXlymCGcdg2/BUVVlkLIDq2lXqUYlxtknKjHAG2eCrul98qI Ctni/Xo3JUu395GBF4UvhOGuSMjUu1oKUZpvkZkJ3rSQKxXZ2tUuYgI9QCLOAQPahQ7f RLBhoOENKlatU5UO02XBOqa29ayEoCakuDtTK/EcVtjCMPOVInqhd8zvEl2/nA1h5SSZ /0RR2Rq4WvZQiQRkt1DNJjm3vwpKU+EXBnNiz12dfYErVYnAhw/lUx+Oo4I13ify6GZE g3lA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=p9sK5bIA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y9si13370250edi.0.2021.04.14.01.38.26; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 01:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=p9sK5bIA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245161AbhDMVfK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:35:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229911AbhDMVfK (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:35:10 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc30.google.com (mail-oo1-xc30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c30]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1EDBC061574 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc30.google.com with SMTP id t140-20020a4a3e920000b02901e5c1add773so2915824oot.1 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=FOllnPXHllv++nMeKGcRp72HvHtuzEorYNDS+7csQnc=; b=p9sK5bIAOVE/cIygFsqF2n3RJ/Zvp7PrybYGikPgpMOukszsWN9yMqWh8+kqno3Ps7 R5ebKFToe6e8f8vRJt+jFwyNSobdRLprqZt+Hsy887uwEIDEh6os48OkyTvqg6KFbrTP jNL6QUiU4Rc5uLuSb1WybpZuII9c1Yb36cOEHHl/S7qAvxsO68SBHZ+55PNfbasDQmiu W91v0TctoRIZvmnh98wnCGVnNCQJXXSUiPNmu20LG3w3/U+ZW7DulFM/vQshw0YGIWmh uixtKVdjPVdfb1wadaScaxQgzx02kG0G2U8YM/5ChAY+cFFOF0YO3h3vFTbzbp3k+5ae kwDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=FOllnPXHllv++nMeKGcRp72HvHtuzEorYNDS+7csQnc=; b=YVcgpN9PisEx0fZ2D2oTJ/rFNLa/8+yQ6oMx4lPkdeSHsJnK4zTRuRMoUfqXNSXtAN s3Zg9esv7it6kGtq5GpWAT+iFDxlosMvZ1tQXotxWeTjpZYKOskQvfFpH2EC0c6JSZ9p hYKOL9PEt3J8WXqsGEYd7+Xf9DsqCrdbqZK1bL9zuey0fGQTHJzWQ0ABYjLajFLGaQ8V 1MM8A6gQQuw1C2Pn++5dRSA8C4H6aK+cDy19xOC0GKyF6dAVZae0oCqbb8D9aDBjvDW/ KFEDRbBYkDFzCPrcVn/OZ+NMDMcDFMVTf9wHivlGDZ2y+xBeG5bBG4Li4hCiOd/ecsOG HRZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rMJ4mrmqlWff5ZoJsVPKL3Wpj9s1jXFrH+LbEO7v4E/K7u8iB Uf3Y1M82wbP20R/brfWbrO1rEA== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:9533:: with SMTP id m48mr28384650ooi.34.1618349689308; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.lan (104-57-184-186.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [104.57.184.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m127sm3098859oib.32.2021.04.13.14.34.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:34:47 -0500 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring , Alexandre Torgue , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] remoteproc: stm32: add capability to detach Message-ID: References: <20210331073347.8293-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20210331073347.8293-3-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210331073347.8293-3-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 31 Mar 02:33 CDT 2021, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > A mechanism similar to the shutdown mailbox signal is implemented to > detach a remote processor. > > Upon detachment, a signal is sent to the remote firmware, allowing it > to perform specific actions such as stopping rpmsg communication. > > The Cortex-M hold boot is also disabled to allow the remote processor > to restart in case of crash. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier > Tested-by: Mathieu Poirier > --- > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > index 3d45f51de4d0..7353f9e7e7af 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ > #define RELEASE_BOOT 1 > > #define MBOX_NB_VQ 2 > -#define MBOX_NB_MBX 3 > +#define MBOX_NB_MBX 4 > > #define STM32_SMC_RCC 0x82001000 > #define STM32_SMC_REG_WRITE 0x1 > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ > #define STM32_MBX_VQ1 "vq1" > #define STM32_MBX_VQ1_ID 1 > #define STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN "shutdown" > +#define STM32_MBX_DETACH "detach" > > #define RSC_TBL_SIZE 1024 > > @@ -336,6 +337,15 @@ static const struct stm32_mbox stm32_rproc_mbox[MBOX_NB_MBX] = { > .tx_done = NULL, > .tx_tout = 500, /* 500 ms time out */ > }, > + }, > + { > + .name = STM32_MBX_DETACH, > + .vq_id = -1, > + .client = { > + .tx_block = true, > + .tx_done = NULL, > + .tx_tout = 200, /* 200 ms time out to detach should be fair enough */ > + }, > } > }; > > @@ -461,6 +471,25 @@ static int stm32_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc) > return stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, true); > } > > +static int stm32_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > + int err, dummy_data, idx; > + > + /* Inform the remote processor of the detach */ > + idx = stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(rproc, STM32_MBX_DETACH); > + if (idx >= 0 && ddata->mb[idx].chan) { > + /* A dummy data is sent to allow to block on transmit */ > + err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[idx].chan, > + &dummy_data); Seems I posted my comment on v1, rather than this latest version. Please let me know if we should do anything about this dummy_data. Regards, Bjorn > + if (err < 0) > + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "warning: remote FW detach without ack\n"); > + } > + > + /* Allow remote processor to auto-reboot */ > + return stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, false); > +} > + > static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > @@ -597,7 +626,12 @@ stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz) > } > > done: > - /* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */ > + /* > + * Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair. > + * Notice for the detach, that this 1 kB memory area has to be reserved in the coprocessor > + * firmware for the resource table. On detach, the remoteproc core re-initializes this > + * entire area by overwriting it with the initial values stored in rproc->clean_table. > + */ > *table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE; > return (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va; > } > @@ -607,6 +641,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { > .start = stm32_rproc_start, > .stop = stm32_rproc_stop, > .attach = stm32_rproc_attach, > + .detach = stm32_rproc_detach, > .kick = stm32_rproc_kick, > .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > .parse_fw = stm32_rproc_parse_fw, > -- > 2.17.1 >