Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751225AbWJOWCa (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:02:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751227AbWJOWCa (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:02:30 -0400 Received: from h8922032063.dsl.speedlinq.nl ([89.220.32.63]:58070 "EHLO jumbo.lan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751225AbWJOWC3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Oct 2006 18:02:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:58:55 +0200 From: "Dennis J.A. Bijwaard" To: Andrew Morton Cc: bijwaard@gmail.com, "Dennis J.A. Bijwaard" , sct@redhat.com, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! in sys_close and ext3 Message-ID: <20061015215854.GA12890@jumbo.lan> References: <20061015175640.GA3673@jumbo.lan> <20061015121202.378bdd41.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061015121202.378bdd41.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1580 Lines: 41 Hi Andrew, Thanks for your reply. The machine has 512MB and some more swap: Mem: 510960k total, 504876k used, 6084k free, 1868k buffers Swap: 674640k total, 2652k used, 671988k free, 354832k cached Machine may be slow for current standards, it has 2 * 500Mhz Kind regards, Dennis * Andrew Morton [061015 21:13]: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:56:40 +0200 > "Dennis J.A. Bijwaard" wrote: > > > I got two soft lockups on one of the CPUs just now. I'm unsure if this > > problem is in ext3, sys_close, or general kernel, so I've CC'd the > > kernel list. > > > > [1.] One line summary of the problem: > > > > BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! in sys_close/fput and ext3 journaling > > Both warnings occurred when the kernel was tearing down large amounts of > pagecache via invalidate_inode_pages(). One instances was a blockdev > (probably the final close on the dvd) and the other was a regular file > (perhaps a large dvd image?) > > The CPU is slow: 500MHz pIII. How much memory does it have? > > So the kernel was doing a lot of work, on a slow CPU. Perhaps that simply > exceeded the softlockup timeout. If that's true then the machine should > have recovered. Once it did, and once it didn't. I don't know why it > didn't. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/