Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:29:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:29:40 -0500 Received: from [208.129.208.52] ([208.129.208.52]:9220 "EHLO xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 19:29:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 16:37:46 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Mike Fedyk cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , lkml , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [patch] scheduler cache affinity improvement for 2.4 kernels In-Reply-To: <20011108153749.A14468@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Ingo's patch in effect lowers the number of jiffies taken per second in the > scheduler (by making each task use several jiffies). > > Davide's patch can take the default scheduler (even Ingo's enhanced > scheduler) and make it per processor, with his extra layer of scheduling > between individual processors. Don't mix things :) We're talking only about the CpuHistory token of the scheduler proposed here: http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/mss.html This is a bigger ( and not yet complete ) change on the SMP scheduler behavior, while it keeps the scheduler that runs on each CPU the same. I'm currently working on different balancing methods to keep the proposed scheduler fair well balanced without spinning tasks "too much"(tm). - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/