Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3150feb19421ca6b15202c853215f8b40fe35567.1617615067.git.Rijo-john.Thomas@amd.com>
 <CAHUa44Gga=k3indU8FC3X5xE=6RnKEDNeZBDWeJzm47-Spm0QA@mail.gmail.com> <1318f015-40cb-2bdd-17fb-2a3843ed45bc@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <1318f015-40cb-2bdd-17fb-2a3843ed45bc@amd.com>
From:   Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:46:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHUa44EtLazK8YezYCV7_oGxfarsXv5CfSivqiBecb7=LrYYqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tee: amdtee: unload TA only when its refcount becomes 0
To:     Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas@amd.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Devaraj Rangasamy <Devaraj.Rangasamy@amd.com>,
        Mythri Pandeshwara krishna <mythri.pandeshwarakrishna@amd.com>,
        OP-TEE TrustedFirmware <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jiro,

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:20 PM Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas@amd.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/04/21 1:06 pm, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 11:43 AM Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas@amd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Same Trusted Application (TA) can be loaded in multiple TEE contexts.
> >>
> >> If it is a single instance TA, the TA should not get unloaded from AMD
> >> Secure Processor, while it is still in use in another TEE context.
> >>
> >> Therefore reference count TA and unload it when the count becomes zero.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 757cc3e9ff1d ("tee: add AMD-TEE driver")
> >> Reviewed-by: Devaraj Rangasamy <Devaraj.Rangasamy@amd.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas@amd.com>
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >>  * Unload TA if get_ta_refcount() fails
> >>
> >>  drivers/tee/amdtee/amdtee_private.h | 13 ++++
> >>  drivers/tee/amdtee/call.c           | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>  drivers/tee/amdtee/core.c           | 15 +++--
> >>  3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > Looks good to me. Please address Dan's comment.
> >
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> I have replied to Dan's comment.
>
> If you are okay with the current patch, request you to pull this.

By addressing the comment I meant fixing it not just replying that
you're going to ignore it. :-)
I can't see any reason why the preferred style shouldn't be used.

Cheers,
Jens