Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: MJC7Aw7DXwX60FJUdz0de0aQDW2h3rGO8m6mmHdRzfGvvc3CwyAwlT0+feBIViATfN23kAGsyp
 BbDR96jjSlyw==
IronPort-SDR: QWUsGFJgdDqPIdf8WgwLE3snSAtlxd3nPW6cEcKKnSYoIgIfBTbFPG31qYfmXL+6RRgisHlsrP
 VPUpMILwql3Q==
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:33:25 +0300
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To:     Aline Santana Cordeiro <alinesantanacordeiro@gmail.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: pci: Format multi-line comments
 according to coding-style in file atomisp_cmd.c
Message-ID: <20210414183325.GD3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210414182755.GA2799@focaruja>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210414182755.GA2799@focaruja>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Hi Aline,

Thanks for the patch.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:27:55PM -0300, Aline Santana Cordeiro wrote:
> Format multi-line comments according to the coding-style.
> Issue detected by checkpatch.pl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aline Santana Cordeiro <alinesantanacordeiro@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c | 109 ++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> index 592ea99..6113785 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@
>   * At 15fps this means 133ms. We set the timeout a bit longer.
>   * Each flash driver is supposed to set its own timeout, but
>   * just in case someone else changed the timeout, we set it
> - * here to make sure we don't damage the flash hardware. */
> + * here to make sure we don't damage the flash hardware.
> + */
>  #define FLASH_TIMEOUT 800 /* ms */
>  
>  union host {
> @@ -562,7 +563,8 @@ irqreturn_t atomisp_isr(int irq, void *dev)
>  			 * and driver needs to keep old sequence_temp value.
>  			 * NOTE: There is assumption here that ISP will not
>  			 * start processing next frame from sensor before old
> -			 * one is completely done. */
> +			 * one is completely done.
> +			 */
>  			if (atomic_read(&asd->sequence) == atomic_read(
>  				&asd->sequence_temp))
>  				atomic_set(&asd->sequence_temp,
> @@ -1247,7 +1249,8 @@ void atomisp_buf_done(struct atomisp_sub_device *asd, int error,
>  
>  	if (IS_ISP2401) {
>  		/* If there are no buffers queued then

This should begin with:

		/*
		 *

And the same for the rest. Apart from this the patch seems fine.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus