Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210412065759.2907-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
 <20210413025011.1251-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> <20210413091812.0000383d@intel.com>
 <CAL+tcoBVhD1SfMYAFVn0HxZ3ig88pxtiLoha9d6Z+62yq8bWBA@mail.gmail.com> <20210414190837.0000085a@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210414190837.0000085a@intel.com>
From:   Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:16:22 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoAfVCJMgeVFnyHaZhEEJRiWEYc5hm5c0GOKwg2BDiVtYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] i40e: fix the panic when running bpf in xdpdrv mode
To:     Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc:     anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
        hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
        kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
        kpsingh@kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Xing <xingwanli@kuaishou.com>,
        Shujin Li <lishujin@kuaishou.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:08 AM Jesse Brandeburg
<jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Jason Xing wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:27 AM Jesse Brandeburg
> > <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > kerneljasonxing@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Jason Xing <xingwanli@kuaishou.com>
> > >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > Sorry, I missed this on the first time: Added intel-wired-lan,
> > > please include on any future submissions for Intel drivers.
> > > get-maintainers script might help here?
> > >
> >
> > Probably I got this wrong in the last email. Did you mean that I should add
> > intel-wired-lan in the title not the cc list? It seems I should put
> > this together on
> > the next submission like this:
> >
> > [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v4]
>
> Your v3 submittal was correct. My intent was to make sure
> intel-wired-lan was in CC:
>

Well, I get to know more about the whole thing.

> If Kuba or Dave wants us to take the fix in via intel-wired-lan trees,
> then we can do that, or they can apply it directly. I'll ack it on the
> v3.

Thanks, Jesse:)

Jason

>