Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422722AbWJPMfu (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:35:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422723AbWJPMfu (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:35:50 -0400 Received: from gwmail.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.19]:29928 "EHLO emea5-mh.id5.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422722AbWJPMft (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:35:49 -0400 Message-Id: <4533991C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:37:16 +0200 From: "Jan Beulich" To: "Jiri Kosina" , "Andi Kleen" Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Dmitry Torokhov" , , , , "Andrew Morton" , Subject: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans? References: <200610161231.30705.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200610161231.30705.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1481 Lines: 36 >> stack backtrace: >> [] dump_trace+0x65/0x1a2 >> [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x10/0x20 >> [] show_trace+0xa/0xc >> [] dump_stack+0x13/0x15 >> [] __lock_acquire+0x7bd/0xa05 >> [] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x7b >> [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xab/0x1de >> [] i2c_transfer+0x23/0x40 [i2c_core] >> [] dibx000_i2c_gated_tuner_xfer+0x166/0x185 [dibx000_common] >> [] i2c_transfer+0x2f/0x40 [i2c_core] >> [] mt2060_readreg+0x4b/0x69 [mt2060] >> [] mt2060_attach+0x40/0x1ea [mt2060] >> [] dibusb_dib3000mc_tuner_attach+0x126/0x16c >> [dvb_usb_dibusb_common] >> [] 0xd10ea000 >> DWARF2 unwinder stuck at 0xd10ea000 > >Hmm, no assembly code or anything. Jan, do you have any ideas? >This looks just like a simple callback that goes over a module >boundary. No, except if this was compiled with gcc 4.0.x (or maybe earlier), in which case inspection of the unwind data might be needed to tell if it's one of the mis-generated cases that we saw earlier. Again - a stack trace alone (as above) will never be likely to yield anything, raw stack data and in some (most?) cases the relevant unwind data are also needed. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/