Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:54:31 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        conghui.chen@intel.com, kblaiech@mellanox.com,
        jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
        Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@gmail.com>,
        Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        yu1.wang@intel.com, shuo.a.liu@intel.com,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
Message-ID: <20210415072431.apntpcwrk5hp6zg4@vireshk-i7>
References: <226a8d5663b7bb6f5d06ede7701eedb18d1bafa1.1616493817.git.jie.deng@intel.com>
 <20210323072704.rgoelmq62fl2wjjf@vireshk-i7>
 <a2994a8f-bbf9-b26f-a9d2-eb02df6623b8@intel.com>
 <CAK8P3a3OBUZC2nxaQ2wyL9EeT3gzXUX9sfJ+ZJfJUiJK_3ZkrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210415064538.a4vf7egk6l3u6zfz@vireshk-i7>
 <b25d1f4e-f17f-8a14-e7e6-7577d25be877@intel.com>
 <20210415072131.GA1006@kunai>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210415072131.GA1006@kunai>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 15-04-21, 09:21, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > I didn't forget this. It is a very small change. I'm not sure if the
> > maintainer Wolfram
> > 
> > has any comments so that I can address them together in one version.
> 
> Noted. I'll have a look in the next days.

Now that we were able to catch you, I will use the opportunity to
clarify the doubts I had.

- struct mutex lock in struct virtio_i2c, I don't think this is
  required since the core takes care of locking in absence of this.

- Use of I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED flag, I don't think it is required for
  new drivers.

:)

-- 
viresh