Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750857AbWJPN1T (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:27:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750907AbWJPN1S (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:27:18 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:7134 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750847AbWJPN1S (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:27:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Would SSI clustering extensions be of interest to kernel community? From: Alan Cox To: Constantine Gavrilov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <45337FE3.8020201@qlusters.com> References: <45337FE3.8020201@qlusters.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:54:01 +0100 Message-Id: <1161006841.24237.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 827 Lines: 18 Ar Llu, 2006-10-16 am 14:49 +0200, ysgrifennodd Constantine Gavrilov: > 2) Are kernel maintainers interested in clustering extensions to Linux > kernel? Do they see any value in them? (Our code does not require kernel > changes, but we are willing to submit it for inclusion if there is > interest.) If they are doing SSI well and do not need core kernel changes then yes they sound very interesting to me. Historically the big concern has always been that things like this muck up the kernel core which affects the other 99.99999% of users who don't want SSI clustering. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/