Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750748AbWJPOeR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:34:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750756AbWJPOeR (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:34:17 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:64998 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750751AbWJPOeQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:34:16 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: dwarf2 stuck Re: lockdep warning in i2c_transfer() with dibx000 DVB - input tree merge plans? Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:34:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: "Jiri Kosina" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200610161617.51111.ak@suse.de> <4533B249.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> In-Reply-To: <4533B249.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610161634.10329.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 24 On Monday 16 October 2006 16:24, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> Yes, unfortunately this is another instance of gcc 4.0 generating bad > >> unwind data when optimizing and not accumulating outgoing args. > >> Andi - did you already create a patch implementing Michael's suggestion? > > > >You mean using -maccumulate-outgoing-args ? Not yet. > > > >I guess we can do it unconditionally for all gccs on both i386 > >and x86-64, right? > > Yes, I concluded this from Michael's description; what I don't know is > whether the option isn't available on very old gcc-s. Mainline only supports gcc 3.1+ these days, so we don't really care about those. I did the change. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/