Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp977961pxb; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:47:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPOavziHsxDxAEK+eoB3JFd8DKwdffYFzJtBavZXmiX2d4C13BN3nhT7I4LdoGtAREKsB0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:cbb:: with SMTP id cn27mr5676891edb.296.1618508861849; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618508861; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BkWABw2juQeHfqor5yfyyT+HWdiloc8yS4Eyb3ltP0V6AaNibGeyHoVyKraqAiW8cp FfuLlcaoqEAqN+shPEYNelj4kj5FQjw6Ef7sEeqiggJw0qn21NYR1dcbjKWpdkk/uifv eUbjUeh0LMYqvzQc0t48lCUpa1le25owtOooDjvpj9bcI1F/9IQYTWaI9zan4RSE5oW2 p+2EtmOFuaUteT8/tNMTokBWIZ+EKSmYQUraufTdj5wEW0LAu7h9ZliAySPlHit1x4Ky gY478GXd9ppmWVa4+Zkl7uYOmL+ybuyNmB9SUyAN+Iyb/0pYWYP++gqaBmGA238QgYaP HiEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:subject:from:dkim-signature; bh=mAQgrrs/fT5iNfRVmF2BgfffAf7Nhr3HzWZJ/IDRqis=; b=sX4YdjOlnkopFlvkSV3uiJ0bRb771WXmjnRdtJ0nfdxDspXy8f/MAiYW/HibutfgEs NETiKGt4mANSOaYGWauuo3zTsboQL0/WsBd64iF8aAGAdgTU4Gxg2y8xRK6osPILYrjn gb2V7FdztSXiRlEuz0DpLGHTHtc5DayWkhMKWTbCpMEltuPKEcIRUYCW+PyPAns8eOU1 qBB+TXXb5kHwL5W5Y1AJkPGRKBpO3ugJdTStTvPsWNEugeHNbKRMn5v3NN1tnnlRBN/J vn8uG1qDkRUQ6ImU4Uzs4CJ0ZVjktZ0b9LF2UFRubEnzy7+p2LruAvJvDcioit7kmhIW lGnw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OOvJC6R4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w11si3251096ede.2.2021.04.15.10.47.17; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OOvJC6R4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233134AbhDORqZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:46:25 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:36650 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233395AbhDORqY (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:46:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618508761; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mAQgrrs/fT5iNfRVmF2BgfffAf7Nhr3HzWZJ/IDRqis=; b=OOvJC6R4otrdzb9op85ngGLWPLClzSK6qLqk8GbD8PzTOaRDRo9I9GQ5hk9ZlmE4WzPP2M 8up2yvrGoAroazETU1J810OV3yWtO+IeZxs6zgLme+oWBkO8j1ObtQ9wJzInaXZzmLaYlc XMr5QrzXZkGUMOJc8gu9BWTR2QOb+Mc= Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-310-mBfLwsDRMdeX73fu5-sRUQ-1; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:45:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mBfLwsDRMdeX73fu5-sRUQ-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id x7-20020a05622a0007b029019d73c63053so4500667qtw.16 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=mAQgrrs/fT5iNfRVmF2BgfffAf7Nhr3HzWZJ/IDRqis=; b=n1iRENn0FIHmEy+WRbik1h0Rp6MvAvEm+7Psny6sYilBTXosdgOwqYRpZDqZUdVTUz MJRrdMumT/KfD+zH0U6pfv76RK744GKNDrCvO8zc7RA16V713yHTVU3it0LrUJ9TUSO1 tCO0+OTTT8F2SHmNIXn5AM8PXExMcwaUHkTLNuIkcpl+Q1XI4ew1kTwUDqRttB2sT12x 7GFa/rovmVF5rLxgLzIqcEY4gM9MuaQtosXtzaOQHeOWxEH6nEOD0lecORXhRJFlH/fQ BNkPfEBjXkA8CynsZE+NiSyJImjgmuxFvSROSr4mz864DXunMdV485NmjOH7A6IMi31t 7i1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533s9pRl1MUZPD/7PgSodO8nrhn4hltJfJalvWu/HoFLp3BQ5mb8 sGK4HysVZAbxCpxk1lv+m8yq1H3X9GbAMTrcDSfL/R9tLqTJ1i6yonO5ulQZ05m72Dx1onUt3u7 2oYwWT/DYZORsCrXajSzqkT7N X-Received: by 2002:ac8:594:: with SMTP id a20mr4035562qth.295.1618508757084; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ac8:594:: with SMTP id a20mr4035543qth.295.1618508756868; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from llong.remote.csb ([2601:191:8500:76c0::cdbc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c23sm2375540qkk.24.2021.04.15.10.45.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:45:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Waiman Long X-Google-Original-From: Waiman Long Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath To: Ali Saidi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, steve.capper@arm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Boqun Feng References: <20210415172711.15480-1-alisaidi@amazon.com> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:45:54 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210415172711.15480-1-alisaidi@amazon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/15/21 1:27 PM, Ali Saidi wrote: > While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can > acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops > checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly > acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed > successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the > acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads following > the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before the write > lock is truly acquired. > > We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while > holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from under it. > > Writer | Reader 2 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ep_scan_ready_list() | > |- write_lock_irq() | > |- queued_write_lock_slowpath() | > |- atomic_cond_read_acquire() | > | read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags); > --> (observes value before unlock)| chain_epi_lockless() > | | epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi); > | | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags); > | | > | atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() | > |-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); | > > A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the > atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire semantics > addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can be switched > to use relaxed semantics. > > Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock") > Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Acked-by: Will Deacon > Tested-by: Steve Capper > Reviewed-by: Steve Capper > > --- > kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c > index 4786dd271b45..10770f6ac4d9 100644 > --- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c > @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock) > > /* When no more readers or writers, set the locked flag */ > do { > - atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING); > - } while (atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->cnts, _QW_WAITING, > + atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING); > + } while (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->cnts, _QW_WAITING, > _QW_LOCKED) != _QW_WAITING); > unlock: > arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); Acked-by: Waiman Long