Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp258274pxb; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:06:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzsOfZbIzw8fLIKgMnYvF+Y/F+bTh9+7ZA3A9c9a+gLIuTgmYx3GzfFGQp2sxgVLYfvo0M X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:250d:: with SMTP id i13mr8227871ejb.474.1618574805270; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:06:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618574805; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OpH9VrqWLZp5cLb+YMC8XuX59ph+mwjyr4XyCWfQ3UnIXaHeLebm1nk5zwqQ6s9Uea tJoTYTfq3d2ftLmGNHx4e7+wwMfZGawtNDaUp3tERVJhHmikHI+GCZq/1hALEHF+ce4B O17Bw0NS8Ib47ZoG27hLqcObb/nac/l+/ywYtvqt5LFbZ3dbVlTMjuGHnYswMg97KE7l MEKkQ3PvuY9QspQWnbC1r+Uh0c8Q3RU4xtBgJol+SM8BmfLX1JJGFh6QEnBAq3euRhsv hJ2w7YR8peWCR7AWQ2ygcMHR4sJkFt059cO6jJQIqtz4aB+fMywnxI3PT5fhei3HlLek sQxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=c7JIj59yc2ENaSMrf6qheCY40shyaM30ZXuwxfZhJOo=; b=0HUyT4auO5tXUJRSRQUMMUEUuQZisK6Sm21j+bLEXRTkavGMPp/idOpU9J3Vuz1Zx9 Zldw9Z7WGXI7y0yA+R6j7Ai5qhiaCpyVpflDHeHNjOzjukT6wMX45kN3jZZQ2IJGEJav /jZGIws1tBnFj8oxC/YSC7RCTkfAs0Ji+MEbKZ8Kaar6VcMPBd7mtuZ9wav3VFqoV445 PnwO/AgUlPRpr4qEMQswicLTuVdRo21BjwJmAwjjl8gwXszkX3otne96vG02hhSQiMa3 Bbz/QPrcerLsAktrqNJ3ByNfRkpMMSJGp4G/C834Mn94/scKBEcAeQ5DVDdIuNF+gVMA ddtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b13si5195435ede.162.2021.04.16.05.06.17; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:06:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240931AbhDPKjg (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 06:39:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37322 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235267AbhDPKjg (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 06:39:36 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A35AFC9; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:39:11 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Yang Li Cc: perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: isa: Fix inconsistent indenting In-Reply-To: <1618567198-5120-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1618567198-5120-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:59:58 +0200, Yang Li wrote: > > Kernel test robot throws below warning -> > > smatch warnings: > sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c:191 snd_opti9xx_init() warn: > inconsistent indenting > sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c:488 snd_opti9xx_init() warn: > inconsistent indenting > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot > Signed-off-by: Yang Li > --- > sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c b/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c > index 08e61d9..234f023 100644 > --- a/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c > +++ b/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c > @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int snd_opti9xx_init(struct snd_opti9xx *chip, > chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware]; > } > #else > - chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware]; > + chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware]; > #endif No, it's not correct. The ifdef is a bit tricky here but the line you changed belongs to the else section. thanks, Takashi