Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 00:59:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 00:59:14 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:40970 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 00:59:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 06:59:04 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Rusty Russell Cc: Andi Kleen , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives? Message-ID: <20011109065904.A14557@wotan.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20011109141215.08d33c96.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i In-Reply-To: <20011109141215.08d33c96.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>; from rusty@rustcorp.com.au on Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:12:15PM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:12:15PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > Modules have lots of little disadvantages that add up. The speed penalty > on various platforms is one, the load/unload race complexity is another. At least for the speed penalty due to TLB thrashing: I would not really blame modules in this case, it is just an application crying for large pages support. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/