Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 21:03:48 +0530
From:   Ashish Kalra <eashishkalra@gmail.com>
To:     =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     eashishkalra@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] staging: wfx: silence symbol 'wfx_get_ps_timeout' was not
 declared warning
Message-ID: <20210419153348.GA22782@ashish-NUC8i5BEH>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Precedence: bulk

Upon running sparse, "warning: symbol 'wfx_get_ps_timeout' was not declared.
Should it be static?" and "warning: symbol 'wfx_update_pm' was not declared.
Should it be static?" is brought to notice for this file.  static keyword
should be added to prevent this warning. let's add it to make it cleaner and
silence the Sparse warning.

Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <eashishkalra@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
index 12e8a5b638f1..d855d87c2102 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ void wfx_configure_filter(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, unsigned int changed_flags,
 	mutex_unlock(&wdev->conf_mutex);
 }
 
-int wfx_get_ps_timeout(struct wfx_vif *wvif, bool *enable_ps)
+static int wfx_get_ps_timeout(struct wfx_vif *wvif, bool *enable_ps)
 {
 	struct ieee80211_channel *chan0 = NULL, *chan1 = NULL;
 	struct ieee80211_conf *conf = &wvif->wdev->hw->conf;
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ int wfx_get_ps_timeout(struct wfx_vif *wvif, bool *enable_ps)
 		return -1;
 }
 
-int wfx_update_pm(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
+static int wfx_update_pm(struct wfx_vif *wvif)
 {
 	int ps_timeout;
 	bool ps;
-- 
2.25.1