Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp2996185pxb; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:43:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0S6eZUxa064lhOly8jQVedbgmEz4QMkwbEe48t+BdBFthcfEUJfOuXqN9EC2ZBlP1ptgX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3ce9:: with SMTP id d9mr25212104ejh.172.1618890205657; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:43:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618890205; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mTpvD7eYhQERdoLP0sWSpT7pZiu9AQVUnFfdsd/p52uGx4cRKgO1fzj9CWe40xmwKB 7tvG6wMxR0HTw8r/oPVPB/sYaxvHKE/zjlGbThIiVPjHH2QLrhTEOWdY3M6LxaCB/08N SK4Wg23R02S74EhoUV4rrSHYnTEPEtP6A5zwBDLQpyCk9gzgkXbkqebnBtUw3CaZkg9Y icV2ajOLILgcJKADCKnCJFI48zorRp27hCHhB1MyOB46bAjbSxS02H/POtd22lN/18zj dt/TqZV/acv3lnNFJ1cCPo2uItMHC73LiT87L+l8KVHsLpJ52rkSsr6N8dAcUP6aDxcQ hRyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=aoh3cVYV3Au2MjTFcrXYuK/j5Le2ZRSttW9WmkjNjpk=; b=lZIxYgChgvnSBRGxxbNrvh0KTiP1ae1BI8AnS3ajsT8kWqsszZQ31PksvYM5pvRMD9 gbbmAds3I2Z2+7m1n32uUdf0XwBuYUi0FwUmN5YUIRSIsz7Lzo6vDmfIjbHVtOFdcOuZ 7GnyNVAm+IcPmtPQPsX5ofyQAqLLB4r/haf3S0o/HBEg3dt5snfsp3bAEWgqWnE+Rhn8 VdRes12NQfdf3qSetx6nDXo0H570s5Y8Xnt7r4rf21UWMf1T3BsDPaEXa38G7NCxzsRV 35ETcd231mgovxsuup+NTPJktSkV0KxoPRUD6L4gtYfyf2UPMcNVj8onQJ6MVX7Gitbz I7Kw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k25si14974238eja.292.2021.04.19.20.43.02; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229649AbhDTDml (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:42:41 -0400 Received: from mail.hallyn.com ([178.63.66.53]:55366 "EHLO mail.hallyn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229508AbhDTDmk (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 23:42:40 -0400 Received: by mail.hallyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D7C3DA8E; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:42:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 22:42:08 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Christian Brauner Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , lkml , Linus Torvalds , Kees Cook , "Andrew G. Morgan" , "Eric W. Biederman" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , security@kernel.org, Tycho Andersen , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: require CAP_SETFCAP to map uid 0 (v3.3) Message-ID: <20210420034208.GA2830@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20210416045851.GA13811@mail.hallyn.com> <20210416150501.zam55gschpn2w56i@wittgenstein> <20210416213453.GA29094@mail.hallyn.com> <20210417021945.GA687@mail.hallyn.com> <20210417200434.GA17430@mail.hallyn.com> <20210419122514.GA20598@mail.hallyn.com> <20210419160911.5pguvpj7kfuj6rnr@wittgenstein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210419160911.5pguvpj7kfuj6rnr@wittgenstein> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 07:25:14AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > cap_setfcap is required to create file capabilities. > > > > Since 8db6c34f1dbc ("Introduce v3 namespaced file capabilities"), a > > process running as uid 0 but without cap_setfcap is able to work around > > this as follows: unshare a new user namespace which maps parent uid 0 > > into the child namespace. While this task will not have new > > capabilities against the parent namespace, there is a loophole due to > > the way namespaced file capabilities are represented as xattrs. File > > capabilities valid in userns 1 are distinguished from file capabilities > > valid in userns 2 by the kuid which underlies uid 0. Therefore the > > restricted root process can unshare a new self-mapping namespace, add a > > namespaced file capability onto a file, then use that file capability in > > the parent namespace. > > > > To prevent that, do not allow mapping parent uid 0 if the process which > > opened the uid_map file does not have CAP_SETFCAP, which is the capability > > for setting file capabilities. > > > > As a further wrinkle: a task can unshare its user namespace, then > > open its uid_map file itself, and map (only) its own uid. In this > > case we do not have the credential from before unshare, which was > > potentially more restricted. So, when creating a user namespace, we > > record whether the creator had CAP_SETFCAP. Then we can use that > > during map_write(). > > > > With this patch: > > > > 1. Unprivileged user can still unshare -Ur > > > > ubuntu@caps:~$ unshare -Ur > > root@caps:~# logout > > > > 2. Root user can still unshare -Ur > > > > ubuntu@caps:~$ sudo bash > > root@caps:/home/ubuntu# unshare -Ur > > root@caps:/home/ubuntu# logout > > > > 3. Root user without CAP_SETFCAP cannot unshare -Ur: > > > > root@caps:/home/ubuntu# /sbin/capsh --drop=cap_setfcap -- > > root@caps:/home/ubuntu# /sbin/setcap cap_setfcap=p /sbin/setcap > > unable to set CAP_SETFCAP effective capability: Operation not permitted > > root@caps:/home/ubuntu# unshare -Ur > > unshare: write failed /proc/self/uid_map: Operation not permitted > > > > Note: an alternative solution would be to allow uid 0 mappings by > > processes without CAP_SETFCAP, but to prevent such a namespace from > > writing any file capabilities. This approach can be seen here: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sergeh/linux.git/log/?h=2021-04-15/setfcap-nsfscaps-v4 > > > > Ah, can you link to the previous fix and its revert, please? I think > that was mentioned in the formerly private thread as well but we forgot: > > commit 95ebabde382c371572297915b104e55403674e73 > Author: Eric W. Biederman > Date: Thu Dec 17 09:42:00 2020 -0600 > > capabilities: Don't allow writing ambiguous v3 file capabilities > > commit 3b0c2d3eaa83da259d7726192cf55a137769012f > Author: Eric W. Biederman > Date: Fri Mar 12 15:07:09 2021 -0600 > > Revert 95ebabde382c ("capabilities: Don't allow writing ambiguous v3 file capabilities") Sure. Is there a tag for that kind of thing or do I just mention it at the end of the description?