Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 03:35:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 03:35:06 -0500 Received: from mail.pha.ha-vel.cz ([195.39.72.3]:522 "HELO mail.pha.ha-vel.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 03:34:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 09:34:50 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Alan Cox Cc: george anzinger , Jonas Diemer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VIA 686 timer bugfix incomplete Message-ID: <20011109093450.A7676@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <3BEAF962.8E407C30@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:30:52PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:30:52PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Me thinks the real solution is the ACPI pm timer. 3 times the > > resolution of the PIT and you can not stop it. The high-res-timers > > patch will allow you to use this as the time keeper and just use the PIT > > to generate interrupts. > > For awkward boxes you can use the PIT, for good boxes we can use rdtsc or > eventually the ACPI timers when running with ACPI The problem is that we use PIT even together with TSC because we need to know how much time passed since last interrupt to be able to synchronize the TSC with possibly delayed timer interrupts and TSC doesn't tell us that ... but hopefully this can be done with some kind of PLL ... -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/