Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: OEE3+NQVTPibBb97Q1t/voWMLsAOWQKGKmgKzQltFYchc8QVg5Idhss+w9kCNBwkyHPU977dER
 AI9ldFCtmQrw==
IronPort-SDR: dM4sAtHmAvUU0E/HzIJpF1Mxak3MPMiOy+ImXYzhL5aHCBDkR23wTvaoNfscCd0JbCnAbyS9RB
 3YHvWIhpSSbg==
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:54:57 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@linux.intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
        baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
        bhelgaas@google.com, rajatja@google.com, grundler@chromium.org,
        tfiga@chromium.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2] iommu/vt-d: Use passthrough mode for the Intel IPUs
Message-ID: <YH7rQbDzQAlY5Z7R@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <1618886913-6594-1-git-send-email-bingbu.cao@intel.com>
 <YH6q+FCTQheO6FHi@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <c9a0fc75-8b7b-e0ae-572e-8ca030a04537@linux.intel.com>
 <20210420105640.GI3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
 <YH7BNbk/mhq6VXPo@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20210420143727.GP3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210420143727.GP3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:37:27PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:55:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:56:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:34:26PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> > > > On 4/20/21 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:48:33AM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > > This misses the changelog from v1 followed by the explanation why resent.
> > > > > 
> > > > I noticed there was a typo in the recipient list:
> > > > stable.vger.kernel.org -> stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > 
> > > > no code change for resent.
> > > 
> > > When you're submitting a patch and want it reach the stable kernels, you'll
> > > need to add a Cc tag:
> > > 
> > > 	Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > 
> > > But not actually add the address to cc. I dropped stable@vger address from
> > > distribution.
> > 
> > Does it really matter?
> 
> Usually aligning what you're doing with
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst is not a bad idea.

True, my point is that technically both ways will give the same result, no?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko