Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:46:29 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To:     satya priya <skakit@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kgunda@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8350c: Add temp-alarm support
Message-ID: <YH73VU+mSHodeTSf@google.com>
References: <1618389266-5990-1-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
 <1618389266-5990-3-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1618389266-5990-3-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:04:23PM +0530, satya priya wrote:
> Add temp-alarm node for PM8350C pmic and also modify gpio
> node to add gpio ranges and "qcom,spmi-gpio" compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> index 2b9b75e..e1b75ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> @@ -13,13 +13,43 @@
>  		#address-cells = <1>;
>  		#size-cells = <0>;
>  
> +		pm8350c_temp_alarm: temp-alarm@a00 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
> +			reg = <0xa00>;
> +			interrupts = <0x2 0xa 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
> +			#thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
> +		};
> +
>  		pm8350c_gpios: gpio@8800 {
> -			compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-gpio";
> +			compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
>  			reg = <0x8800>;
>  			gpio-controller;
> +			gpio-ranges = <&pm8350c_gpios 0 0 9>;

a separate patch for this would probably be preferable, but I guess it's ok

Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>