Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:34:09 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>,
        Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@amazon.com>,
        Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@gmx.net>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
        Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stsp2@yandex.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 16/19] vsock/loopback: enable SEQPACKET for
 transport
Message-ID: <20210421093409.latwryhd7scomdav@steredhat>
References: <20210413123954.3396314-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
 <20210413124642.3406320-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210413124642.3406320-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:46:39PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This adds SEQPACKET ops for loopback transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
>callback.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>index a45f7ffca8c5..d38ffdbecc84 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static int vsock_loopback_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>+static bool vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow(void);
>+
> static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> 	.transport = {
> 		.module                   = THIS_MODULE,
>@@ -89,6 +91,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> 		.stream_is_active         = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> 		.stream_allow             = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
>
>+		.seqpacket_dequeue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
>+		.seqpacket_enqueue        = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
>+		.seqpacket_allow          = vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow,
>+
> 		.notify_poll_in           = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> 		.notify_poll_out          = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> 		.notify_recv_init         = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
>@@ -103,8 +109,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> 	},
>
> 	.send_pkt = vsock_loopback_send_pkt,
>+	.seqpacket_allow = true
> };
>
>+static bool vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow(void)
>+{
>+	return loopback_transport.seqpacket_allow;
>+}

here I think we could always return true, since we will remove 
`.seqpacket_allow` from struct virtio_transport.

>+
> static void vsock_loopback_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> 	struct vsock_loopback *vsock =
>-- 
>2.25.1
>