Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:57:25 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Saripalli, RK" <rsaripal@amd.com>
Cc:     Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/speculation: Add PSF mitigation kernel parameters
Message-ID: <20210421185725.GC22401@zn.tnic>
References: <20210421090117.22315-1-rsaripal@amd.com>
 <20210421090117.22315-5-rsaripal@amd.com>
 <4c688fc7-67df-3187-54b2-bf20e510fb39@infradead.org>
 <jpg4kfzfpzm.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy>
 <20210421184826.GA3120@zn.tnic>
 <863ece71-463f-fc50-db13-7fd280902d6b@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <863ece71-463f-fc50-db13-7fd280902d6b@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 01:55:03PM -0500, Saripalli, RK wrote:
> I separated them into separate patches because the KVM patch depends on one of the patch.
> The corresponding QEMU patch depends on another patch.
> 
> By separating them into 4 separate patches, my thinking was I could keep them logically separate.

Sure but they all go together through the same tree - why does that
matter for Qemu/KVM?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette