Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 06:33:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 06:33:28 -0500 Received: from mustard.heime.net ([194.234.65.222]:50413 "EHLO mustard.heime.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 06:33:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 12:33:14 +0100 (CET) From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk To: Jan Kara cc: Subject: Re: Large files and filesystem block size In-Reply-To: <20011109103013.B1734@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I'm setting up a server serving large >=1GB files. I spoke to this guy > > that just finished his PhD on the subject > > (http://ConfMan.unik.no/~paalh/index2.html) , and he said he'd managed to > > increase the throughput by using a 64kB block size on the files system. > > This testing was done on NetBSD (as far as I can remember). > > > > Does anyone know of a file system that supports large files, large > > filesystems and large block sizes? > Linux doesn't support larger block size than page size (ie. 4 KB on i386). Is this limit the indepandant of file system type? > > Does any of you have any theories if his practice in using larger block > > sizes will have the same impact on performance in Linux as it had in BSD? > I think performance will improve but only for large files (but that's > probably what you want). As I'm writing above, the files I'm talking of are typically 1-10GB. So yes - this is what I want. roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/