Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210420090727.1246116-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> <20210420091240.1246429-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210420091240.1246429-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:12:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZBCMygPoW+rY83nc7OrdEWaEyuoqzSsJ=t+mGvYroxNg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: rockchip: do coding style for mux route struct
To:     Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Tao Huang <huangtao@rock-chips.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:12 AM Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com> wrote:

> The mux route tables take many lines for each SoC, and it will be more
> instances for newly SoC, that makes the file size increase larger.
>
> This patch only do coding style for mux route struct, by adding a new
> definition and replace the structs by script which supplied by
> huangtao@rock-chips.com
>
> sed -i -e "
> /static struct rockchip_mux_route_data /bcheck
> b
> :append-next-line
> N
> :check
> /^[^;]*$/bappend-next-line
> s/[[:blank:]]*.bank_num = \([[:digit:]]*,\)\n/\tRK_MUXROUTE_SAME(\1/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*0,\n/ RK_PA0,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*1,\n/ RK_PA1,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*2,\n/ RK_PA2,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*3,\n/ RK_PA3,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*4,\n/ RK_PA4,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*5,\n/ RK_PA5,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*6,\n/ RK_PA6,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*7,\n/ RK_PA7,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*8,\n/ RK_PB0,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*9,\n/ RK_PB1,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*10,\n/ RK_PB2,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*11,\n/ RK_PB3,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*12,\n/ RK_PB4,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*13,\n/ RK_PB5,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*14,\n/ RK_PB6,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*15,\n/ RK_PB7,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*16,\n/ RK_PC0,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*17,\n/ RK_PC1,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*18,\n/ RK_PC2,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*19,\n/ RK_PC3,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*20,\n/ RK_PC4,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*21,\n/ RK_PC5,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*22,\n/ RK_PC6,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*23,\n/ RK_PC7,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*24,\n/ RK_PD0,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*25,\n/ RK_PD1,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*26,\n/ RK_PD2,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*27,\n/ RK_PD3,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*28,\n/ RK_PD4,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*29,\n/ RK_PD5,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*30,\n/ RK_PD6,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.pin =[[:blank:]]*31,\n/ RK_PD7,/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.func = \([[:digit:]]*,\)\n/ \1/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.route_location =[[:blank:]]*\([[:print:]]*,\)\n//g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.route_offset = \(0x[[:xdigit:]]*,\)\n/ \1/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*.route_val =[[:blank:]]*\([[:print:]]*\),\n/ \1),/g
> s/\t{\n//g
> s/\t}, {\n//g
> s/\t},//g
> s/[[:blank:]]*\(\/\*[[:print:]]*\*\/\)\n[[:blank:]]*RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(\([[:print:]]*\)),\n/\tRK_MUXROUTE_SAME(\2), \1\n/g
> s/[[:blank:]]*\(\/\*[[:print:]]*\*\/\)\n[[:blank:]]*RK_MUXROUTE_SAME(\([[:print:]]*\)),/\tRK_MUXROUTE_SAME(\2), \1\n/g
> " drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> v3:
>  - remove change-id

This v3 applied, I had to do some fuzzing, hope it worked!

Yours,
Linus Walleij