Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 20:00:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 20:00:29 -0500 Received: from innerfire.net ([208.181.73.33]:63758 "HELO innerfire.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 20:00:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:31:25 -0800 (PST) From: Gerhard Mack To: "Richard B. Johnson" cc: Michael Rothwell , Linux kernel Subject: Re: Advanced Linux Kernel/Enterprise Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote: > > > "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > > > > Relating some "nine goals of 'Enterprise Computing'" to Multics is > > > the bullshit. > > > > Funny, I got those off the "Multics FAQ" page. > > > > -M > > > > > History is being rewritten. When Multics was being developed by AT&T, > it was found to be unusable on the DEC. It was a PDP-8, so the > story is told. General Electric got the first contract to make > a machine specifically designed for Multics and development > continued. > > The original DEC was "given" to W. M. Ritchie and his staff in > "Department 58213". He wanted to use it for games. To do so, required > him to write some sort of OS, which became Unix. > > As I said, when Multics was designed, the only criteria as to > get it to work on a DEC. It didn't. To use this development as > an example of "enterprise computing" is absurd and belies its > well documented history. But .. but... but they said so on slashdot. That must make it true. ;) -- Gerhard Mack gmack@innerfire.net <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/