Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 07:24:58 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc:     Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: Add a wakeup mode parameter to
 put_unlocked_entry()
Message-ID: <20210422062458.GA4176641@infradead.org>
References: <20210419213636.1514816-1-vgoyal@redhat.com>
 <20210419213636.1514816-3-vgoyal@redhat.com>
 <20210420093420.2eed3939@bahia.lan>
 <20210420140033.GA1529659@redhat.com>
 <CAPcyv4g2raipYhivwbiSvsHmSdgLO8wphh5dhY3hpjwko9G4Hw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4g2raipYhivwbiSvsHmSdgLO8wphh5dhY3hpjwko9G4Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 12:09:54PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Can you get in the habit of not replying inline with new patches like
> this? Collect the review feedback, take a pause, and resend the full
> series so tooling like b4 and patchwork can track when a new posting
> supersedes a previous one. As is, this inline style inflicts manual
> effort on the maintainer.

Honestly I don't mind it at all.  If you shiny new tooling can't handle
it maybe you should fix your shiny new tooling instead of changing
everyones workflow?