Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp227046pxy; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:14:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+2FZcsoHuN+DQ0u1MqkmLv4pc5JgJ39X0sDqU4Tj7elGRYDCI7YKm0BPjjrIpq4UAt5Nn X-Received: by 2002:a50:fe01:: with SMTP id f1mr2033633edt.272.1619075659814; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:14:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619075659; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0WKTyjrjfP8635/mMzoKZFCP3f/Eu3pGF2QmFH1Ih08FJ26UyZpHZfPV1Tw3k1Engh 3jFQpIZ7ihRVpaoBvMaiWM93z8gsI4FYOJvUP33Dqudep8ZLQO8Ao+uwscSOZC3iClqA tWGRpbE67lG4mp0OZaKBajHWiM03tIaK1IsX4KCeZUzbAUuvJlAXJwYLL6ULrbmbGzxQ 3iIpgHuuKKKGVE7M5ofcAu3wE9PZ124pF0JP/KTJ3krK5ZmOkPihR8Ygufc9ho41LrDD 4D6iD7/KjJYQoa5Y+RAO0lqPMTXbDwM1TfMO2wbfv80r3AAWSFTtWejtCfl/kXD68Ckg 9BAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=X338HNooootoGgLp4Uh2rRwvRKYDOVvH5vsvPe4Uc28=; b=rRm9cOQivgSWluE5V/S2/AuGvQ7m+4ULqnBMc2trvL7Vj4f0Ol0tGkBp3hdQHkP6Vd bMhEOerViX8IAt5aBO4psiOO2MYEZc1gxMJe29jiV7j47PkVfLc/Sxea24r7+N81Mtja bHAtKQ1+8Q7Rvv5xXiA8mGWnv7bJ4FuUwHdimz1cb/hea02e7F1Gx3AyxPCkxZniW3br NVs9/ZxBNGw6jyaJ7XH3Ap+n1HUk1TNqXvs+Toij542ihUln820G7cBgmzpW7CGaSIhQ V+hALJbcoUIu4ROXio8/zfbTh/q0WdmT9Rajv+0wJecHyVyyK7B8aebh/lLByVT1gzW/ iSNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=A4XeclTy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jl15si1418022ejc.18.2021.04.22.00.13.55; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=A4XeclTy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229629AbhDVHKS (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 03:10:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51830 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229655AbhDVHKR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 03:10:17 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75F7C06174A; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id g5so60461047ejx.0; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X338HNooootoGgLp4Uh2rRwvRKYDOVvH5vsvPe4Uc28=; b=A4XeclTyEu5VZVCgWBT7mGSoaa+ezp2msSvlhn3okMVtX8kfU5RTlI0DB9GK8Bfy1c YsZ+tEqCWOg/FfoWRnk+uwU/bW9ynDbdPAkNUDc0judgL9b//hLi8sw8YrJuYAKoQTdQ bBthX0C89A7XDfJ9/XCmHFiPk/EzStAMu0BW8+KCped+pUq/lRJFX2xrZJ4MyzgfSZPW ySCMEbY9lqECYczEpDOPc+5XgQIvvxg3t7czWVhDnsOTV5BUCfPfHcDEh+jLu6wTU66U hh4kHAmtWM5ElPVOxLmhQK0SF1nDcAeXn5gc7/l85MyXFa+X3m77+OmxcJFzMkeRG1BF Ijjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X338HNooootoGgLp4Uh2rRwvRKYDOVvH5vsvPe4Uc28=; b=ZV605v+x2dc0fLSwirbcouzlOZoduPuTZaPEuNLte3tk79+tdAtNW8W9OPTHVkODPR ac8CmFqXC8707ccmTpjuWkgqlVs5zhZfGaYzAbud3oLUGqFq/m8W8Dy8vxwScnX/l1dF aFkrkmFkC5mthatHRG6CRqzMHv6l9KFr2iciUkZc0pR/IO2wGQJ5EvDsOwqbp2SWJWgK 11L8+LmnzQB1Bvspc0hXgqF01DinCWSu2GuFZJFUgYWXskskeLUf7HOJ0idWw4rEBwaN 60pVPujkiGMKiZy0nX3MOoz7jhQO5guIrwdVBV7D2nIrGRAPhqVS7AI4jbe2Pg8B39Mi 0mEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329uQIz6xSgEq4vcJVcg/RlcTQj4AU5h0DbfBqrTkmQpF2mAb1L b9VvFrmH1nSBuNA0ROtocmG0h5StPH6h7w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b01:: with SMTP id u1mr1875232ejg.310.1619075381367; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ea:8f38:4600:bdfe:7c1a:e805:a0da? (p200300ea8f384600bdfe7c1ae805a0da.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ea:8f38:4600:bdfe:7c1a:e805:a0da]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s8sm1258056edj.25.2021.04.22.00.09.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices To: AceLan Kao , Jakub Kicinski Cc: Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Wei Wang , Cong Wang , Taehee Yoo , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , netdev , LKML References: <20210420075406.64105-1-acelan.kao@canonical.com> <20210420122715.2066b537@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:09:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.04.2021 08:30, AceLan Kao wrote: > Yes, should add > > Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach") > and also > Fixes: 9513d2a5dc7f ("igc: Add legacy power management support") > Please don't top-post. Apart from that: If the issue was introduced with driver changes, then adding a workaround in net core may not be the right approach. > Jakub Kicinski 於 2021年4月21日 週三 上午3:27寫道: >> >> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:34:17 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:54 AM AceLan Kao wrote: >>>> >>>> From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" >>>> >>>> The rtnl_lock() has been called in rtnetlink_rcv_msg(), and then in >>>> __dev_open() it calls pm_runtime_resume() to resume devices, and in >>>> some devices' resume function(igb_resum,igc_resume) they calls rtnl_lock() >>>> again. That leads to a recursive lock. >>>> >>>> It should leave the devices' resume function to decide if they need to >>>> call rtnl_lock()/rtnl_unlock(), so call rtnl_unlock() before calling >>>> pm_runtime_resume() and then call rtnl_lock() after it in __dev_open(). >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Hi Acelan >>> >>> When was the bugg added ? >>> Please add a Fixes: tag >> >> For immediate cause probably: >> >> Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach") >> >>> By doing so, you give more chances for reviewers to understand why the >>> fix is not risky, >>> and help stable teams work. >> >> IMO the driver lacks internal locking. Taking rtnl from resume is just >> one example, git history shows many more places that lacked locking and >> got papered over with rtnl here.