Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp228255pxy; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:16:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwF/dMHk6cp82FFulPjK+SWd3YjMWudZI7g0n7Lzj53UEwNirt3Y61yWRiSyQYUWtXZ6b01 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fb81:: with SMTP id lr1mr1793421ejb.62.1619075779084; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:16:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619075779; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ffzpqWHpzM2prZhQ9Y6Jefl+JGHkHPm/R8HbiYJrhVzJe65FU8lfuUkvJDU660QIU4 Z9apTZGtfbMuQ6mVrKy4FGw6AlcuhylcAcb1gk/IcRf3IifASbrtAHHTMwHRpXJk+4cD wnhajLAL6QyrXMd5+aY+LAArGVsMgX/50tyE3NKZHzYzZWZLOt7/0SnEyhDfcmyutOXh CtvjJF+iydeD/3NwFu8G2tCL0QlEoxCDdPLt43q8tkYQI/rekFjf+hHclQjYjf/8FZkf /XsPAjlsMzh4ZokNKMsQloei0pNpMGRcHbN3oBMUnHqj6oNod1PHWCDNkiFGqXsMqgy5 hbzw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=333HG+VOrJibDnm0Ca/99I3kXDoF96x8TBdvPJgpKKs=; b=nJcnv40To8cjEpZruK3P/sWOBjcS6x4qWGaH3NJwC2hFSMzD5+TWzyZGYBQSITrPex pmdPePMziGm7wH5SiIWDPjlMgR4cKMWguxD0r+/wkwgCt32OAJdaAD9EQwsES772DJfj 94huYKrctPFVAQXdVUb3GsqWu926gfFYkcZ3usDxC/cSNetDCVTalSzBIor7LDErNpYU gS5MwtY/W/GP3B+YQ0/7x2lnthSA5lvzQS20ADMU566a2cEyXqviGiwKVAbrKkPUXpHn 8rcB6iQ1ACQk/bbjnaFcFitXu3lTiABZzDVq7pN3l9GLn+/AqKd43KZSnzAdPqqb3nbn x6uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jl15si1418022ejc.18.2021.04.22.00.15.54; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230241AbhDVHPQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 03:15:16 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:17023 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229655AbhDVHPP (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 03:15:15 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FQpWC6PfszPsNC; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:11:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.110.154] (10.136.110.154) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:14:36 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] f2fs: reduce expensive checkpoint trigger frequency To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , , , References: <20210416095838.29568-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <733ba2da-4047-045b-5223-05012b980603@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:14:35 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.136.110.154] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/4/22 12:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 04/16, Chao Yu wrote: >> We may trigger high frequent checkpoint for below case: >> 1. mkdir /mnt/dir1; set dir1 encrypted >> 2. touch /mnt/file1; fsync /mnt/file1 >> 3. mkdir /mnt/dir2; set dir2 encrypted >> 4. touch /mnt/file2; fsync /mnt/file2 >> ... >> >> Although, newly created dir and file are not related, due to >> commit bbf156f7afa7 ("f2fs: fix lost xattrs of directories"), we will >> trigger checkpoint whenever fsync() comes after a new encrypted dir >> created. > > It'll happen once? How much impact will we hit due to this? Yunlei reports me this issue, the problems here in Honer device's specified environment, most fsync() on regular file triggers a checkpoint() when mkdir() happened concurrently, result in causing the performance issue. Yunlei could explain more about details of this issue. @Yunlei > >> >> In order to avoid such condition, let's record an entry including >> directory's ino into global cache when we initialize encryption policy >> in a checkpointed directory, and then only trigger checkpoint() when >> target file's parent has non-persisted encryption policy, for the case >> its parent is not checkpointed, need_do_checkpoint() has cover that >> by verifying it with f2fs_is_checkpointed_node(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >> --- >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++ >> fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++ >> fs/f2fs/xattr.c | 6 ++++-- >> include/trace/events/f2fs.h | 3 ++- >> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> index 87d734f5589d..34487e527d12 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h >> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ enum { >> APPEND_INO, /* for append ino list */ >> UPDATE_INO, /* for update ino list */ >> TRANS_DIR_INO, /* for trasactions dir ino list */ >> + ENC_DIR_INO, /* for encrypted dir ino list */ >> FLUSH_INO, /* for multiple device flushing */ >> MAX_INO_ENTRY, /* max. list */ >> }; >> @@ -1090,6 +1091,7 @@ enum cp_reason_type { >> CP_FASTBOOT_MODE, >> CP_SPEC_LOG_NUM, >> CP_RECOVER_DIR, >> + CP_ENC_DIR, >> }; >> >> enum iostat_type { >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c >> index 6284b2f4a60b..a6c38d8b1ec3 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c >> @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static inline enum cp_reason_type need_do_checkpoint(struct inode *inode) >> f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_pino, >> TRANS_DIR_INO)) >> cp_reason = CP_RECOVER_DIR; >> + else if (f2fs_exist_written_data(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->i_pino, >> + ENC_DIR_INO)) >> + cp_reason = CP_ENC_DIR; >> >> return cp_reason; >> } >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c >> index c8f34decbf8e..38796d488d15 100644 >> --- a/fs/f2fs/xattr.c >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/xattr.c >> @@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int index, >> const char *name, const void *value, size_t size, >> struct page *ipage, int flags) >> { >> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode); >> struct f2fs_xattr_entry *here, *last; >> void *base_addr, *last_base_addr; >> int found, newsize; >> @@ -745,8 +746,9 @@ static int __f2fs_setxattr(struct inode *inode, int index, >> !strcmp(name, F2FS_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT)) >> f2fs_set_encrypted_inode(inode); >> f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true); >> - if (!error && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) >> - set_sbi_flag(F2FS_I_SB(inode), SBI_NEED_CP); >> + if (!error && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && >> + f2fs_is_checkpointed_node(sbi, inode->i_ino)) >> + f2fs_add_ino_entry(sbi, inode->i_ino, ENC_DIR_INO); > > Is it right to say ENC_DIR_INO in this case? Sorry, I didn't get it. Thanks, > >> >> same: >> if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ACL_MODE)) { >> diff --git a/include/trace/events/f2fs.h b/include/trace/events/f2fs.h >> index 56b113e3cd6a..ca0cf12226e9 100644 >> --- a/include/trace/events/f2fs.h >> +++ b/include/trace/events/f2fs.h >> @@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(CP_RESIZE); >> { CP_NODE_NEED_CP, "node needs cp" }, \ >> { CP_FASTBOOT_MODE, "fastboot mode" }, \ >> { CP_SPEC_LOG_NUM, "log type is 2" }, \ >> - { CP_RECOVER_DIR, "dir needs recovery" }) >> + { CP_RECOVER_DIR, "dir needs recovery" }, \ >> + { CP_ENC_DIR, "persist encryption policy" }) >> >> #define show_shutdown_mode(type) \ >> __print_symbolic(type, \ >> -- >> 2.29.2 > . >