Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161153AbWJRPUV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:20:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161172AbWJRPUV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:20:21 -0400 Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.25]:1810 "EHLO smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161153AbWJRPUU (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:20:20 -0400 Message-ID: <45364631.9070805@xs4all.nl> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:20:17 +0200 From: Udo van den Heuvel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.18 w/ GPS time source: worse performance References: <4534F5F7.8020003@xs4all.nl> <1161103616.2919.70.camel@mindpipe> In-Reply-To: <1161103616.2919.70.camel@mindpipe> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=8300CC02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 631 Lines: 15 Lee Revell wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 17:25 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: >> >> Why does a GPS as time source (with ntpd) perform so much worse with 2.6.18? > > Um... you don't give nearly enough information to even begin to know > what you're talking about. No one here with a vague idea about the cause for the bad performance? I am sure I not the only one experiencing this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/