Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp293820pxy; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:14:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7jYZYX64i5SItFy9eaxw48cPSCJE3461U4cGhil2YEYDigbQDJ0251yonQEm4RtnZizX4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ce8d:: with SMTP id g13mr2887812pju.85.1619082894400; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:14:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619082894; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vnvnp3xipRLLLgQWuSJ/gglX0/fh7I8TS6ifLNuW2v/I5XtJebAkNDtRjpRaXlOzgA oGseth7mVt3NeNDcG4+x1JhIWUPLKrfhcxqSjirmGOkGrGl31pw3FxrOi67CJ3Htxnq/ yz3Uhwv2/ynOEGsDYd+gMWss7CN/VXzcmvm2+frzQkh6xwM+xcZHceGkHM6cUHeB7Bnt fd7x8oEqchGcZRjhNvEbTbU8defTSFw1SawFRVTjQygyzmH88h55bZwtsTDl7QT7zVXI lAkqx26xdkPhN024cSTL3BtqzjxAmmiCFZBJi2De66kCS1ONaeKMjw8wFnfshX6SXS6H Esjw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=wG8P4+rcysNlnukOUAOLjeHQskEohAiWIfsdi1AIttw=; b=e55FpA4X1+8qVds7YKvClYUutX05Rl3O66GdBFIDTgWrBh7Btdx+cHUV7JtkjDbwDP w77yENrCcThs3y1Ac0plTtBGR154qo/zc/Ox65g/vd6O31GOwkiNfq8siUCmsqpQHVa6 al8ajc+tkB1A/me7Y/3LdM3GyItvng5pM8LIcYaKQAShEG+G9THuJweHBOGQNwnDeJie jGfU/QUiu/fKWhbAeqiFj7vmVxWyahwD+yRz4okv9d6ecZu4RcPY96TyiFT3TrHyQhHn MrKCM9wIWLOaVFIZhXUhMSdL17lJ/Ff+ZRl7tPeR9zeyeuXp4nGpLoL0FTPm7qrGtBeI VY5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24si2429188pfj.160.2021.04.22.02.14.41; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235598AbhDVJNW (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:13:22 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk ([157.25.102.26]:39418 "EHLO angie.orcam.me.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230270AbhDVJNQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:13:16 -0400 Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9A17392009C; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956CA92009B; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:12:40 +0200 (CEST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Thomas Bogendoerfer cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , Arnd Bergmann , Huacai Chen , Huacai Chen , Jiaxun Yang , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MIPS: Avoid DIVU in `__div64_32' is result would be zero In-Reply-To: <20210422075645.GA5996@alpha.franken.de> Message-ID: References: <284CBC37-0F4F-4077-A172-7E47C90B8B43@goldelico.com> <20210422075645.GA5996@alpha.franken.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > Thomas, as this mistake has spread across three out of these patches, > > both in change descriptions and actual code, would you mind dropping the > > series from mips-next altogether and I'll respin the series with all > > these issues corrected? > > I'm sorry, but I don't rebase mips-next and the patches have been pushed > out before I received this mail. Hmm, what about changes known to actually break something then? Like with R6 here? Those will undoubtedly cause someone a headache with bisection sometime in the future. Are you sure your policy is the best possible? NB, I have benchmarked the update with my DECstation, however my Malta has not come up after a reboot last evening and neither it has after a few remote power cycles. I have planned a visit in my lab next week anyway, so I'll see what has happened there; hopefully I'm able to bring the board back to life as I find it valuable for my purposes. I had to replace the PSU it came with already a couple years back and the new one is supposedly high-quality, so I fear it's the board itself. Meanwhile I'll be able to give DECstation figures only. I guess such limited results will suffice if I post the fix as an update rather than replacement. Maciej