Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp637440pxy; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAO739TYwk5O055CRUKfMh2xbYtb+bXo4W43pl/JDKDgWGKMSHDb0MieP5xuPwXEwjPUnA X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c1c8:: with SMTP id d8mr5098581edp.236.1619110513234; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619110513; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vi1N9rymS6s6J5Rdy3nYaYxhc3Or+pkHQG9wdD3s/ud9E9yxlW9tUDPYxSRR0/gIk8 pBuGF53p+tM+1NlkI4yYIVJ77QZCNppF7bX2M1H/jnNfhop/wkegkrY66i7I9QQO5aEV oxxBtiF5Lh6KtecWNs+8SMiTUrvEHtumoFT6jJ8g3DYXKQx4Z4iAFzea4ENlbgL31ZHp qA0jwz1qzQHUfBus/0Zm25LuVVq/MHdEQ+4/FoUyW1C6CGEFP5FAlvX606VFDEud+Brv 0AFZnVQd5ZGi+nnBR/1TOsiRnDd7UK2O2uO3mAmk8EB0An7V8ru49NrTBeK78zfCICTz w9lw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=EBYiS5O6HVn14SjBcZWFZ+4S7ILRBpaMYileQHLz1Zg=; b=vmaHrsgSk5n3lI/1VRCC1CplTJ3o1SqLcd6T7OQVpKNfNYaF6ACrfedHRjWKIUnfNQ 23Aebcm2cawNlE3SA/tKAN5rNCeO2HTMtJjEoTV1oIUhCe7J5A0cHfcnlZ91Jk2Zpizw tDIqJ7Gm9ef7Ubl/WwfSrhYh3G7K8dWkspb86uAe7X51Ib4EJAvbElzMVhbL8+fWtqAs oTk2yCbHLFzCP79vSkBFEcgQWrUwiwxY9IaWKa1i4aTTYPMnKNyEkzfyzaRfMn4dC51Q bW1LyLpxI3MGF6ian+JlyJEXNnqlLH0Nx4Y8AOxGRxzfENyKwUf511tp6nP8FTj8rgUO 24fw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=GPIQ8HMy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pg17si2861479ejb.474.2021.04.22.09.54.49; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=GPIQ8HMy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236664AbhDVQya (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:54:30 -0400 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93]:18338 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236459AbhDVQya (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:54:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046660.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13MGq5TF018200; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:53:53 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=EBYiS5O6HVn14SjBcZWFZ+4S7ILRBpaMYileQHLz1Zg=; b=GPIQ8HMySYd0FtxRdHXTo8ifY2P8v9xcpAcqUaRKOHj41eqbh6XMl681dXVnE+8l3qqS tZQgtE0FXgBkAI04Wl0q66oCCppnVog8+7ygy8LtFidXAkNeX6fix1JXG+Ps7ZcEd2xG /dX1EpFWRVXehYmkSUYnGim1rE8GDVJ3/3ofuc78kWxlk3cRlPI7G44D06Z4+Ht5Md5f q/onjCwhxyh6D6pGQGM/M40H6FO2zZxx9jaBpsNnenkXNUNaMsMBVQvonreOT+SbgCo0 VpmI3zfD4vQpOXwqBvqdFoDSiXM7mC0qBk8nuPdyNHZ+aVntUzQBGISJWTUut6xZRMoM bQ== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 382fxqj5ex-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:53:53 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 4D98810002A; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:53:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag2node3.st.com [10.75.127.6]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 3DCA1249F9F; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:53:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmecxl0889.lme.st.com (10.75.127.50) by SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:53:51 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] rpmsg: char: Introduce a rpmsg driver for the rpmsg char device To: Mathieu Poirier CC: Bjorn Andersson , Ohad Ben-Cohen , , , References: <20210413134458.17912-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20210413134458.17912-6-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20210421174053.GA1223348@xps15> <47015357-b006-1c32-f63f-d4fcac054d6f@foss.st.com> <20210422163622.GC1256950@xps15> From: Arnaud POULIQUEN Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:53:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210422163622.GC1256950@xps15> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.50] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG1NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.2) To SFHDAG2NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.6) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-22_11:2021-04-22,2021-04-22 signatures=0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/22/21 6:36 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:58:27AM +0200, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote: >> On 4/21/21 7:40 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >>> Good day Arnaud, >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:44:56PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: >>>> A rpmsg char device allows to probe the endpoint device on a remote name >>>> service announcement. >>>> >>>> With this patch the /dev/rpmsgX interface is created either by a user >>>> application or by the remote firmware. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen >>>> >>>> --- >>>> update from V1: >>>> - add missing unregister_rpmsg_driver call on module exit. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c >>>> index a64249d83172..4606787b7011 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c >>>> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ >>>> #include "rpmsg_char.h" >>>> #include "rpmsg_internal.h" >>>> >>>> +#define RPMSG_CHAR_DEVNAME "rpmsg-raw" >>>> + >>> >>> Why not simply call it rpmsg-char? >> >> I would avoid to link the rpmsg name service to the Linux Kernel device. > > To me that's exactly what we want to do... Am I missing something? A discussion started about a service layer in the OpenAMP library. "rpmsg-char" doesn't really make sense in OpenAMP, especially for OpenAMP<->openAMP communication. That's why I think a generic name would be more suitable. Regards, Arnaud > >> >>> >>>> static dev_t rpmsg_major; >>>> >>>> static DEFINE_IDA(rpmsg_ept_ida); >>>> @@ -403,13 +405,67 @@ int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent >>>> } >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev); >>>> >>>> +static int rpmsg_chrdev_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo; >>>> + struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev; >>>> + >>>> + if (!rpdev->ept) >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + >>>> + memcpy(chinfo.name, RPMSG_CHAR_DEVNAME, sizeof(RPMSG_CHAR_DEVNAME)); >>>> + chinfo.src = rpdev->src; >>>> + chinfo.dst = rpdev->dst; >>>> + >>>> + eptdev = __rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(rpdev, &rpdev->dev, chinfo, NULL); >>>> + if (IS_ERR(eptdev)) >>>> + return PTR_ERR(eptdev); >>>> + >>>> + /* Set the private field of the default endpoint to retrieve context on callback. */ >>>> + rpdev->ept->priv = eptdev; >>> >>> This is already done in rpmsg_create_ept() when rpmsg_eptdev_open() is called. >>> >>>> + >>>> + return 0; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev) >>>> +{ >>>> + int ret; >>>> + >>>> + ret = device_for_each_child(&rpdev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_eptdev); >>>> + if (ret) >>>> + dev_warn(&rpdev->dev, "failed to destroy endpoints: %d\n", ret); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static struct rpmsg_device_id rpmsg_chrdev_id_table[] = { >>>> + { .name = RPMSG_CHAR_DEVNAME }, >>>> + { }, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static struct rpmsg_driver rpmsg_chrdev_driver = { >>>> + .probe = rpmsg_chrdev_probe, >>>> + .remove = rpmsg_chrdev_remove, >>>> + .id_table = rpmsg_chrdev_id_table, >>>> + .callback = rpmsg_ept_cb, >>> >>> Not sure why we need a callback associated to this driver when >>> rpmsg_eptdev_open() already creates and rpmsg_endpoint. To me the only thing >>> having a callback provides is the association between the rpmsg_device and the >>> rpmsg_endpoint[1] that happens in rpmsg_dev_probe(). The QC folks already do >>> this association in their platform code[2]. Since this is not done in >>> __rpmsg_create_ept() a check for rpdev->ept == NULL could be done in >>> rpmsg_eptdev_open() and do the assignment there. >>> >>> [1]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc6/source/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c#L513 >>> [2]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc6/source/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c#L1623 >>> >> >> That's a good point! When I started the redesign, I faced some issues with the >> approach you propose. But as I can not remember the reason and because the code >> has evolved, i need to re-think about this. >> > > Glad to see we're on the same page. I stared at this code for a very long time, > thinking there was some kind of bigger picture I wasn't getting. > > >> Thanks, >> Arnaud >> >> >>>> + .drv = { >>>> + .name = "rpmsg_chrdev", >>>> + }, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> static int rpmsg_chrdev_init(void) >>>> { >>>> int ret; >>>> >>>> ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&rpmsg_major, 0, RPMSG_DEV_MAX, "rpmsg_char"); >>>> - if (ret < 0) >>>> + if (ret < 0) { >>>> pr_err("rpmsg: failed to allocate char dev region\n"); >>>> + return ret; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + ret = register_rpmsg_driver(&rpmsg_chrdev_driver); >>>> + if (ret < 0) { >>>> + pr_err("rpmsg: failed to register rpmsg raw driver\n"); >>>> + unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX); >>>> + } >>>> >>>> return ret; >>>> } >>>> @@ -417,6 +473,7 @@ postcore_initcall(rpmsg_chrdev_init); >>>> >>>> static void rpmsg_chrdev_exit(void) >>>> { >>>> + unregister_rpmsg_driver(&rpmsg_chrdev_driver); >>>> unregister_chrdev_region(rpmsg_major, RPMSG_DEV_MAX); >>>> } >>>> module_exit(rpmsg_chrdev_exit); >>>> -- >>>> 2.17.1 >>>>