Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp799234pxy; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:48:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUV6kZvyI185vmNPWXQD78jJ5UpOYL8m3qqMfhbVRyuimwQqLoQ8ch+CWG8mg2nCslmS8A X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7403:b029:e9:d170:5b11 with SMTP id g3-20020a1709027403b02900e9d1705b11mr424816pll.50.1619124531447; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:48:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619124531; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g6ilZPJ4IxoKTXnWZdNw5QQXQKqe3UFhy5826Qneq+PPtadcNXyE2MlJNObwBNTjvC 0O9QWVxpyLmMcAIXyXcLylC3d3hmHjoCSGhdq3NokBipBD7wa5nml67PdFwDcXg3gDfR Fuuak7oQxIn76WTOO7xVOytPs9DMQwrjdeFR6zjMzDvhW4NqK5tpF/EogBJ41WXAZaNZ ptlcNzQw08tQHcZWcWHgnNc+7PIbAYOG3hUNwNh8ESmLPzq0rgGVr+XfwWMlD1V8NGLh tKoTxZHNrXmTQMpJQh9bHFtIYYC+jwO95ByBjaWyvVsal959VU04329ZpAnPxinYp0Jh VoBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=4mH2NcN/XtEk81pxMp4LBKInGwo+Sz23Zu/b2Rvp0UE=; b=afBxpEA0wCKa0vwtNImBQnLY968C2/MRlfolT3H7+nvv1nDaNADOh0XigmzMXh7n4Q hdMe+zFycYfUm35rNKoHjmHdLUqNxPZNAQa4eGf8nhdaEwtWqlbKtXAj0BJBciACgzjv iRgbZqzvL99CzKQJJcbEdYfDf5UoNQmpHjQNQ0Xzgue9554ADAhPZwlhpWX3SU8S8r7t Lcuh9bbPP1emUNfnaH99BzbuCEHjbKo8V+h9vd6X15YBN3HQ3wuIlc1GuHOX0m3/top1 iW8+Def+GR8ZvoSPwx93FpuLKYi1B9xQesRGUPFqU8u41jx35N5YF8oyR5uI2OO+GFbS WPzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u17si3907526pjn.141.2021.04.22.13.48.39; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239398AbhDVUse (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:48:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36060 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236851AbhDVUsd (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:48:33 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::4]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A0CC06174A; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id CF57D92009D; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:47:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C959B92009B; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:47:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 22:47:56 +0200 (CEST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Thomas Bogendoerfer cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , Arnd Bergmann , Huacai Chen , Huacai Chen , Jiaxun Yang , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] MIPS: Avoid DIVU in `__div64_32' is result would be zero In-Reply-To: <20210422110855.GA9564@alpha.franken.de> Message-ID: References: <284CBC37-0F4F-4077-A172-7E47C90B8B43@goldelico.com> <20210422075645.GA5996@alpha.franken.de> <20210422110855.GA9564@alpha.franken.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > Hmm, what about changes known to actually break something then? Like > > with R6 here? Those will undoubtedly cause someone a headache with > > bisection sometime in the future. Are you sure your policy is the best > > possible? > > This is my Linus pull tree, so I'm following > > Documentation/maintainer/rebasing-and-merging.rst Fair enough. > > Meanwhile I'll be able to give DECstation figures only. I guess such > > limited results will suffice if I post the fix as an update rather than > > replacement. > > thank you. I have requested 3/4 to be backported however, so I think in this case 4/4 will have to follow as well as 2/2 of the fix series I have just posted. Will you be able to resolve this somehow? Maciej