Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c:106 early_get_pnodeid() warn:
 inconsistent indenting
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@hpe.com>,
        Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
References: <202104211946.vkuV39N1-lkp@intel.com>
 <84b4fbc3-0310-b7d7-f613-0eb4ae090e1e@hpe.com>
 <20210422090652.GB6361@zn.tnic>
From:   Mike Travis <mike.travis@hpe.com>
Message-ID: <e2e957f1-06f4-29b5-b268-7fd77db25529@hpe.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:50:27 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210422090652.GB6361@zn.tnic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Thanks Boris, I do have a clean up patch to remove more dead code 
coming, I'll put this patch in that if that's okay?

On 4/22/2021 2:06 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:38:37PM -0700, Mike Travis wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused.  I have this in my inbox that someone else has this fix.
>> So will that fix be applied or should I send a separate one that is
>> essentially a duplicate?
> 
> I'm not even considering that fix because I'm tired of getting some
> half-baked robot mails which only resemble patches. The obnoxiousness to
> not have the decency to sit down and write a proper commit message is
> getting totally out of control.
> 
> Apparently some people(?) think that sending robot output to real humans
> *without* even vetting that output is a good idea so off to /dev/null it
> goes.
> 
> If you want this fixed, you could do a proper patch with a sensible
> commit message and I'll take it.
> 
> I'm tired of dumb robots.
> 
> Thx.
> 
>