Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp839751pxy; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:58:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2TcNS5NK+RevtsI3pRI/BGUQ+TQ4sSYnxxq+WRjj1yrzrK2ooDtfrepoTumlrtO+9kKKZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:781:: with SMTP id d1mr732446edy.32.1619128716161; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:58:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619128716; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QdQWV6dsBh578oa0LBIAml53f4Xss2Jq3kasKAtEjYWrU3x5+XcB6ltshmnVFii7Jh mxdRcf3WlSHJsHuygT8t8m3mlEuyKJ4D6w55ehM4/n/tCL/kbx6Rnoa/VfAoNx/oVu2L FTSlRFpjXnhdc8LYVGehtReffpFStuNsNUhTy5K7ROv8JqL+izV90XcG0CdI/WD4/tev o+khPMTrQw3z337DTE7l5ycnkD6puN3uG08ii+IkRqN+pjprj/Id99vWqFyAiRFmc+G9 TAcEBsuiHzb+Y1qKVJKuO4tRMFQ55fBxP2WztVpf9Uo7Ol1dAYBql3qTFiDpMXGmBJiH L0ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=CTXb7Dh/N50pAHBGyG35mxzDqb5gl6QmIs4s0DVcT1M=; b=clxOhZxSQCYR1fjpKIjZQPKWHJ3Egl8R9pSiFnOV2kl6R3A8Hyvz5ubWySccKRx38n kUJiT+rKSW1J760f72Xw9EeRJyMiZ6CwCW98hQaubMW1mtmUoJwnVbJVphO5Z49JZTXW jYwbSMmR2nVcCxUFdS1VlTqoWOk3f7aGNyxRtlmB0uUKl+dwZuh4HvqR1CCT3ZDW1GGB uFjxm+O3uL6pROwiSTTjCJ/HHEdJ4cft1o7xHIXWPV3D7dXAvFo1OAej/1C3CVAj1Uok JYcSgFQsI8wxfGCmqjMJmcDoAOtBTR2ugyAbHuw/Xhhk2qiTfo47snnGfmb+wkdUvE9O ixTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 10si3623581edx.129.2021.04.22.14.58.11; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236915AbhDVV4x (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:56:53 -0400 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:39264 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232844AbhDVV4w (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:56:52 -0400 Received: from sslproxy06.your-server.de ([78.46.172.3]) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1lZhIs-000DUm-AJ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:56:06 +0200 Received: from [85.7.101.30] (helo=linux.home) by sslproxy06.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZhIs-000JP5-1R; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:56:06 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: fix warning comparing pointer to 0 To: Jiapeng Chong , shuah@kernel.org Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1619085648-36826-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: <7ecb85e6-410b-65bb-a042-74045ee17c3f@iogearbox.net> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:56:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1619085648-36826-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.4/26148/Thu Apr 22 13:06:46 2021) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/22/21 12:00 PM, Jiapeng Chong wrote: > Fix the following coccicheck warning: > > ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c:76:15-16: WARNING > comparing pointer to 0. > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong How many more of those 'comparing pointer to 0' patches do you have? Right now we already merged the following with similar trivial pattern: - ebda107e5f222a086c83ddf6d1ab1da97dd15810 - a9c80b03e586fd3819089fbd33c38fb65ad5e00c - 04ea63e34a2ee85cfd38578b3fc97b2d4c9dd573 Given they don't really 'fix' anything, I would like to reduce such patch cleanup churn on the bpf tree. Please _consolidate_ all other such occurrences into a _single_ patch for BPF selftests, and resubmit. Thanks! > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c > index 52a550d..d4247d6 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) > SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test8") > int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg) > { > - if (arg->a == 0) > + if (!arg->a) > test8_result = 1; > return 0; > } >