Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1616945059-8718-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com>
 <CADiBU3-d3_L8RTeYCirnfjJdG=ea6UVenAi8O8GO_LvOaB7OdA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210419072229.GA4869@dell> <20210419072317.GB4869@dell> <20210419072403.GC4869@dell>
 <CADiBU38bMuH00Bcx5hJas2=yAon00ffcGokT4u89vX-LJYuxNA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADiBU38bMuH00Bcx5hJas2=yAon00ffcGokT4u89vX-LJYuxNA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:58:37 +0800
Message-ID: <CADiBU39F4nHC5U+G+fJJemAJgeYxDimi0cXYkm25+YC8qO5yDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] mfd: rt4831: Adds support for Richtek RT4831
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     lgirdwood@gmail.com, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
        jingoohan1@gmail.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Lee:

ChiYuan Huang <u0084500@gmail.com> =E6=96=BC 2021=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8819=E6=
=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=B8=80 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=885:55=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> =E6=96=BC 2021=E5=B9=B44=E6=9C=8819=E6=
=97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E4=B8=80 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=883:24=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Linux mfd reviewers:
> > > > >    It's been three weeks not to get any response from you.
> > > > > Is there something wrong about this mfd patch?
> > > > > If yes, please feel free to let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Couple of things:
> > > >
> > > > First, if you think a patch had fallen through the gaps, which does
> > > > happen sometimes, it is generally considered acceptable to submit a
> > > > [RESEND] ~2 weeks after the initial submission.  FYI: This was such=
 a
> > > > patch.  It was not on, or had fallen off of my radar for some reaso=
n.
> > > >
> > > > Secondly, we are really late in the release cycle.  -rc8 has just b=
een
> > > > released.  Quite a few maintainers slow down at ~-rc6.  Particularl=
y
> > > > for new drivers.
> > > >
> > > > No need to resubmit this driver this time.  It is now on my to-revi=
ew
> > > > list and I will tend to it shortly.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your patience.
> > >
> > > Also you are missing a DT review on patch 4.
> >
> > ... looks like you forgot to Cc them!
> >
> Yap, really. I''ll resend patch 4 and cc them. Thx.

Should I resend the patch and loop DT reviewers?
> > --
> > Lee Jones [=E6=9D=8E=E7=90=BC=E6=96=AF]
> > Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
> > Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for Arm SoCs
> > Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog