Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210422040914.47788-1-ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com> <YIFq2NIhdMWTDshX@lunn.ch>
In-Reply-To: <YIFq2NIhdMWTDshX@lunn.ch>
From:   Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:18:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCv0x1k+Bi+nCY+yJ-n+EYbRW1keRgF35QDNPe-WCO-z8qxBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/14] mtk_eth_soc: fixes and performance improvements
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:23 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:09:00PM -0700, Ilya Lipnitskiy wrote:
> > Most of these changes come from OpenWrt where they have been present and
> > tested for months.
> >
> > First three patches are bug fixes. The rest are performance
> > improvements. The last patch is a cleanup to use the iopoll.h macro for
> > busy-waiting instead of a custom loop.
>
> Do you have any benchmark numbers you can share?
No. Felix, do you have anything handy?

If needed, I'll run some tests before and after the patch series on
OpenWrt against v5.10, but I only have an MT7621 device - should be
better than nothing though...

Ilya