Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp1104275pxy; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:41:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYg8Bup8XJw76LrXVacwQR3qNy/kpSJKkeQmp2bWcj/pJYqsLU03coH0whCgzlp5SZyEaK X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5203:: with SMTP id g3mr2473432ejm.95.1619160067786; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:41:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619160067; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qz+3STAQjUgjoLPLhizKrnrfI8hHJk4qXNV3ySA7xcxHhOLVawPis18QfJvVAfGa10 nRA/HMqjppyaphoudUYAouyl/xu+HiaGyK4CWJPfUEAnDoFtXsdjAi1EiI131NMnIjLR 8sMpaKYvyopEoW6tdgbOI7MBJKRVxVQYPUlxaqYCp/ouz+yDVOj7QUpLgRG6etlYys0n APDHv9UmLSA1VL532D1ASpX9H+qfCtpR4EwmX2WvTVO+fG3EcbQI44euA3lC9iZrrxhe HOzwQX4/CMRx/WtOQbAazSbvG8s36G55fKxgIb11MtM1QCdt66ZpzyabRY67NKW+El6z JOyw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from :references:cc:to; bh=a3VQyFWUF9fRj6shaaETuJqKk6+4QrS66uOD3SxR2t4=; b=SHs0Zm2HigRHpka4vy5m4hoHLHd/WHeYxeVP7k31lp9/usxfFXFMBg9j+Ebs3i5iI4 5VNxXG0q7BCvQmuncOxv+T6Psmz0pptgJiyjDq1tw2xz9R2t+wXHPxDFtr6hjVVRhlVH kNkCpgBTekdv1COJMV1g0YobNAmOrejtWfPmpq2sRZbc/oZC7vYL2M9q0o57kamLn0eP wNIKFIBoREDcWj1xrjc2BRohq7hIJ+QeN9xdgGkXsUA4Lqa5zUrMTjgDw+U0semqHL8/ NnHUU+eyFca+eYvOaAAZ5rgkP04SGT71LjQX1euLmYM+xhn1F2c5SYImCDfKx0+frGfV Vq+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f16si4935267edy.548.2021.04.22.23.40.35; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231635AbhDWGfK (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:35:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50528 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229456AbhDWGfJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:35:09 -0400 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8234::]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6F5C061574; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 23:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ip4d14bd53.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.20.189.83] helo=[192.168.66.200]); authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1lZpOY-0005Wh-NT; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:34:30 +0200 To: Mark Brown Cc: Linus Torvalds , Greg KH , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , regressions@lists.linux.dev, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Pablo Neira Ayuso , ksummit@lists.linux.dev, workflows@vger.kernel.org References: <268a3049-7c0b-8a33-1ff6-5a2d35fcba16@leemhuis.info> <20210422145107.GH4572@sirena.org.uk> From: Thorsten Leemhuis Subject: Re: RFC: building a regression tracking bot for Linux kernel development Message-ID: <1390e998-4847-eebf-1d7b-e9cb6625cff7@leemhuis.info> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:34:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210422145107.GH4572@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-BS Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;linux@leemhuis.info;1619159674;71a19a93; X-HE-SMSGID: 1lZpOY-0005Wh-NT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.04.21 16:51, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:16:40AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> That's it already. The regression was tracked with: > >> * minimal overhead for the reporter >> * no additional overhead for the developers – only something they ought >> to do already became more important > > For things that are caught by the various automated systems the > deduplication might get annoying - even for the systems with a human in > the loop it's very common for things that the automated systems pick up > to end up getting reported several times over due to things like race > conditions in the reporting process. We'll have to see how that goes, > it might be possible to automate some of it. Yeah, good point, thx for pointing it out, will keep an eye on this aspect to make sure it doesn't become a big problem. Ciao, Thorsten