Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp1517339pxy; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdJiZY+4qq9Q8sp9h82udl1As+hoXBdMBtTQX1sgFIP1IqIq7h3wokwgFu17jAHPsZ+yRM X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a00e:: with SMTP id q14mr7031389pjp.70.1619196741418; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:52:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619196741; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Md7SwR66Vtn/g4YNl43OYAz8wKEbM9FNACCVussWc/UgYNiR6ReMhS9oPqjEM0Hnq0 WaV4zpgqdIBIqvqquFNionKb3asFLkwkfCETa6Ts2qfQuyEpgpdiqkTh/dU7YdgH9PCR Z+JCh+I7eIIkFKkWzK/bFSAtpbCC4tt6wZACUazmX7EaI2OursSfbCO1sZNhLuI/V4o/ zQcB0IZf0UU0bWjjk8M+THQ1oRfg9SVj10i52pEp9slF0lDIE1+iP5x+w01PYgCy1FSx oik6SbnkheS6uQ3qiXtdD3LEDzncrF9K8Nn+cr+Qb7iKkrIToRcHQ6IxKpTseQWKyPrt bbvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=y4pkjm/MUU6Uuag0C4rpup8r2mJF5hY0/ih23se2tDE=; b=VwcJHOGNXypYGpT4gzzg/RSBVACFm5+DAFQfeBAlUqavBBdyt6rzsdnAX4FSlFCTpi OIgBsiuY0s3V3C5bKwxUxqRGytgvMjOJVi5hSIOK+deKeASxHJjlUt9QuzUPagPm2Mpd BWof4/Q53aB6S+w0RWA7Rp/5sjChLDEIhHnohDCaIhR5Y23FJUlPX/9JFVFIPAOMoZS4 ngUyevvFlUHDcFUkq+duJNKvz1vBsm+XVzagkn9yelFaLpKW/IwOZsgsohRkOwmaoudQ CGuvtKIQHoZ3/fFX5Tsg+OWCookZNqPYLFGmX1qvU/4ZgMth/HBqpdL4AtP5W/09F1d6 TXZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mailo.com header.s=mailo header.b=Z7JU8H4S; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mailo.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p20si7410999pld.334.2021.04.23.09.52.08; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mailo.com header.s=mailo header.b=Z7JU8H4S; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mailo.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231659AbhDWQv1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:51:27 -0400 Received: from msg-2.mailo.com ([213.182.54.12]:40112 "EHLO msg-2.mailo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229549AbhDWQv0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:51:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mailo.com; s=mailo; t=1619196639; bh=CZadzIrWiMrwCeTcRwv8qn3XrDMN7XCMWo6IZzlVgjg=; h=X-EA-Auth:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=Z7JU8H4Si76QM11HUIb+7+VkfGufQdQVnEZ3hyIofx/8qb1SYqUi6dnfpO9o7iO93 Zywkb/VRgFbpkykpcBMkvscQquiGLD+tiw/DTeE9pPlVKDf1D8D12hPqX8lEca8jDC UcXxFLh5JN95n1B5PAvD6S4ohl8VAAUu7/Ofwo94= Received: by 192.168.90.11 [192.168.90.11] with ESMTP via ip-206.mailobj.net [213.182.55.206] Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:50:39 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: aoDRiUzuVUdCWD7QxyvrIDGIHuWFN8yYEOxIkeBffsOpWvHBoKvsohoiK3d4W3I9AbRCk9QwM691MNfSlrl/lZLx9xZQr6fe Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 22:20:33 +0530 From: Deepak R Varma To: Hans Verkuil Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mh12gx2825@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] staging: media: atomisp: code cleanup fixes Message-ID: <20210423165033.GB252852@localhost> References: <449f49fa-f19b-70bc-5ee9-3187ac43a376@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <449f49fa-f19b-70bc-5ee9-3187ac43a376@xs4all.nl> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Deepak, > > Something weird is going on. This series didn't appear in patchwork > (https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/) and looking at lore.kernel.org: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20210421181101.JySzrynV5EUsi4N5Dh97QA9VUOQjMutu0mNTW7capUw@z/T/#r4d9987c800c28c26c96464bb56916bf0408b4738 > > it appears v3 was seen as replied to the v1 posts instead of a new thread. > > It's probably related to the Message-Id field, which is the same for the > v1 and v3 posts. Not really sure how you managed that :-) > > Please repost so that the v3 series is picked up by patchwork. Hello Hans, Thank you for looking into the patch set. I am really not sure what happened here. I followed the usual steps and resent the patch set with suggested changes. My apologies for the trouble. I will resend the patch set as suggested. Is there anything I can validate at my end to ensure it is different before sending the set across? Thank you, deepak. > > Regards, > > Hans > > On 21/04/2021 20:11, Deepak R Varma wrote: > > This patch set addresses different kinds of checkpatch WARNING and > > CHECK complaints. > > > > Note: The patches should be applied in the ascending order. > > > > Changes since v2: > > Generic change: > > 1. Correct patch versioning in patch subject > > > > Patch Specific change: > > 1. patch 1/6 : none > > 2. patch 2/6 : none > > 3. patch 3/6 : none > > 4. patch 4/6 : > > a. Tag Fabio Auito for the patch suggestion > > > > 5. patch 5/6 : none > > 6. patch 6/6: > > a. Tag Fabio Auito for the patch suggestion > > > > Changes since v1: > > Generic change: > > 1. The patch set is being resent from an email account that matches with > > the patch signed-of-by tag. Issue highlighted by Hans Verkuil. > > > > Patch specific changes: > > 1. patch 1/6 : none > > 2. patch 2/6 : none > > 3. patch 3/6 : none > > 4. patch 4/6 : implement following changes suggested by Fabio Aiuto > > a. Corrected commenting style > > b. Similar style implemented for other comment blocks in > > the same files. > > 5. patch 5/6 : none > > 6. patch 6/6: implement following changes suggested by Fabio Aiuto > > a. use dev_info instead of pr_info > > b. update patch log message accordingly > > > > > > Deepak R Varma (6): > > staging: media: atomisp: improve function argument alignment > > staging: media: atomisp: balance braces around if...else block > > staging: media: atomisp: use __func__ over function names > > staging: media: atomisp: reformat code comment blocks > > staging: media: atomisp: fix CamelCase variable naming > > staging: media: atomisp: replace raw printk() by dev_info() > > > > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 14 +-- > > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 29 ++--- > > .../atomisp/i2c/atomisp-libmsrlisthelper.c | 6 +- > > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c | 2 +- > > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-mt9m114.c | 106 ++++++++++-------- > > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c | 43 ++++--- > > .../media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 10 +- > > 7 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) > > >