Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp2398724pxy; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYVA7VEWN8atrDnNHA4oHYzmAY8OkO0twiS2D01cpGgS+GsaNXMxc5JwHHr1GMR+SlIolf X-Received: by 2002:a50:aad9:: with SMTP id r25mr12219413edc.125.1619300899558; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619300899; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WBBMhplGYwBktgnCPdSEDC8qYZemvZ+UYWuSjF0390jaj1IzgpFwyLELTYENLwNUnb Mmeak3zIJ0jp6DswtKbhKAIxQihjW2Ne4FN7MIjr4FytCgN0bESKFm+UM8KzrRKrYJ1O LaS2CoO7TMljlkPEWr88mcND0RsfkuUjNAe6Dje3G6H6PwCqGPwa3Wcm+qAbAYjARY29 h6Dh1v+83QlCuT6hyE+rGaACDFVyhXvUGEKd1ZeFpys/PaFH7aHmgs2tIvCZnZv7mGKS a7CkUTPw3hGurk8TfbFmLNHcQ4e8g4rIWkUa/e7JNj+Ng0pnoRq1vfBxw9Xigu7gYrjf MjEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=uvNOfoTuzB56ceqkmKY+oWGvxVel5zO/sDE0EqYhDjY=; b=HYCI9sWom5b8HjTX/NIwcelg3FXupnc0RpLN4rGmo6Q8aFY0InxLYUM585vUcmuArA uQiffOBfGx4/mIA6bS6+y1Ixh0IXhY2eS0U1M1/rMlPPjCGWrnEtSe9osHa+Za0pWQ8Y TJc0l5mZ4Ml9puaxKa/BYflwpMG8Xoc76mJ9ibf4QvJcwGCu95e92B6355WK/Of4P3tP Z3WvJvKFIHOR2HdAh4EEttv4Tvn3R76E09JGSASYkRkjPXByKBC2pgKybMpX59+vcqJq Hi91o3qm36Ltq7B31L2pxaxgx2VDPTGjUxIQv3CDETZVpsIuURpZxThPnSXQdycqEMMq gyfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=FJx9Bijx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jj17si9010385ejc.123.2021.04.24.14.47.56; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=FJx9Bijx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237393AbhDXVqa (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:46:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52394 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233568AbhDXVq3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:46:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BEAC061574; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id i12so21559488qke.3; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvNOfoTuzB56ceqkmKY+oWGvxVel5zO/sDE0EqYhDjY=; b=FJx9Bijx6Acou5sivqFJG+qwSWSoWu53oKaNzotdHfoIfiJ4yYJRBAFGxdAynvDRbD qzALirICLUW+Tw9Ys20dNQF/FJKAR7cGKKFuvx9M/bDFkNS5yiTkiHkCafdqdo4bPT/e RnNkCb65aJP0QXLthvtsCes4XqTWcS0MO40K4P6aRU5RyU+Ji/+8Vt5BEz+AxIAKlwis xUARGkICR1yZW70qperS6azFw7QTUbaRrThL60rxMMmmf9bDbkvsoUzuaEFP9IqlBcpB 6ZRWwS9WexlDJoZ2oBkAUwTApC20cxnhpM7jAPPHSqjfZnve2U2m6mYBIVnRyNqdsAjp Ve/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvNOfoTuzB56ceqkmKY+oWGvxVel5zO/sDE0EqYhDjY=; b=bF6qlGktBVfQFUSwLf7mu0fVRIXnyGqFsUzPy0JKNycWc6hCuvzUx/xP1xrIZhxeM+ oluduHMdDDHLhwouUGi6J4d/eFigLnwhrZlow9USRT+aLADwyNfELikWiEdB+7Izlmqy kPn/C8tk8y2c8V9zL/WvV69D73OBTf5ZhjyimjKDKyTPkv9UykJjnAmVp9AXkC8pa7pg ZtGzHOpxR6O0l7l+Dr2hhUrIEBIyX/LgWYOuo/cMifp48ABaDtdojq325gwlCTEYuYpQ 5fJXkfadzMpWCRWjK/9QGdZAJPRwBhwo7kqVRe4gKYlwTunYIDCAaay36CTbe6S6mPbp DzOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/F22y/R2Jn/6Xx8bF3zOjXTA2Fbqk6DHuQ3oPUsvY9Cu+m7Bz loy7TsBphjHsA0CE/9wPhIw= X-Received: by 2002:a37:af44:: with SMTP id y65mr10245520qke.398.1619300750172; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([179.218.4.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b17sm6638904qto.88.2021.04.24.14.45.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Tammela X-Google-Original-From: Pedro Tammela To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Shuah Khan , Pedro Tammela , David Verbeiren , Matthieu Baerts , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] bpf: selftests: update array map tests for per-cpu batched ops Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 18:45:10 -0300 Message-Id: <20210424214510.806627-3-pctammela@mojatatu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210424214510.806627-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com> References: <20210424214510.806627-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Follows the same logic as the hashtable tests. Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela --- .../bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c | 104 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c index e42ea1195d18..f4d870da7684 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/array_map_batch_ops.c @@ -9,10 +9,13 @@ #include +static int nr_cpus; + static void map_batch_update(int map_fd, __u32 max_entries, int *keys, - int *values) + __s64 *values, bool is_pcpu) { - int i, err; + int i, j, err; + int cpu_offset = 0; DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, opts, .elem_flags = 0, .flags = 0, @@ -20,22 +23,41 @@ static void map_batch_update(int map_fd, __u32 max_entries, int *keys, for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) { keys[i] = i; - values[i] = i + 1; + if (is_pcpu) { + cpu_offset = i * nr_cpus; + for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) + (values + cpu_offset)[j] = i + 1 + j; + } else { + values[i] = i + 1; + } } err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &opts); CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno)); } -static void map_batch_verify(int *visited, __u32 max_entries, - int *keys, int *values) +static void map_batch_verify(int *visited, __u32 max_entries, int *keys, + __s64 *values, bool is_pcpu) { - int i; + int i, j; + int cpu_offset = 0; memset(visited, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*visited)); for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) { - CHECK(keys[i] + 1 != values[i], "key/value checking", - "error: i %d key %d value %d\n", i, keys[i], values[i]); + if (is_pcpu) { + cpu_offset = i * nr_cpus; + for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) { + __s64 value = (values + cpu_offset)[j]; + CHECK(keys[i] + j + 1 != value, + "key/value checking", + "error: i %d j %d key %d value %lld\n", i, + j, keys[i], value); + } + } else { + CHECK(keys[i] + 1 != values[i], "key/value checking", + "error: i %d key %d value %lld\n", i, keys[i], + values[i]); + } visited[i] = 1; } for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) { @@ -44,19 +66,21 @@ static void map_batch_verify(int *visited, __u32 max_entries, } } -void test_array_map_batch_ops(void) +static void __test_map_lookup_and_update_batch(bool is_pcpu) { struct bpf_create_map_attr xattr = { .name = "array_map", - .map_type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, + .map_type = is_pcpu ? BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY : + BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, .key_size = sizeof(int), - .value_size = sizeof(int), + .value_size = sizeof(__s64), }; - int map_fd, *keys, *values, *visited; + int map_fd, *keys, *visited; __u32 count, total, total_success; const __u32 max_entries = 10; __u64 batch = 0; - int err, step; + int err, step, value_size; + void *values; DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, opts, .elem_flags = 0, .flags = 0, @@ -67,22 +91,23 @@ void test_array_map_batch_ops(void) CHECK(map_fd == -1, "bpf_create_map_xattr()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno)); - keys = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int)); - values = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int)); - visited = malloc(max_entries * sizeof(int)); + value_size = sizeof(__s64); + if (is_pcpu) + value_size *= nr_cpus; + + keys = calloc(max_entries, sizeof(*keys)); + values = calloc(max_entries, value_size); + visited = calloc(max_entries, sizeof(*visited)); CHECK(!keys || !values || !visited, "malloc()", "error:%s\n", strerror(errno)); - /* populate elements to the map */ - map_batch_update(map_fd, max_entries, keys, values); - /* test 1: lookup in a loop with various steps. */ total_success = 0; for (step = 1; step < max_entries; step++) { - map_batch_update(map_fd, max_entries, keys, values); - map_batch_verify(visited, max_entries, keys, values); + map_batch_update(map_fd, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu); + map_batch_verify(visited, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu); memset(keys, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*keys)); - memset(values, 0, max_entries * sizeof(*values)); + memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_size); batch = 0; total = 0; /* iteratively lookup/delete elements with 'step' @@ -91,10 +116,10 @@ void test_array_map_batch_ops(void) count = step; while (true) { err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd, - total ? &batch : NULL, &batch, - keys + total, - values + total, - &count, &opts); + total ? &batch : NULL, + &batch, keys + total, + values + total * value_size, + &count, &opts); CHECK((err && errno != ENOENT), "lookup with steps", "error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); @@ -108,7 +133,7 @@ void test_array_map_batch_ops(void) CHECK(total != max_entries, "lookup with steps", "total = %u, max_entries = %u\n", total, max_entries); - map_batch_verify(visited, max_entries, keys, values); + map_batch_verify(visited, max_entries, keys, values, is_pcpu); total_success++; } @@ -116,9 +141,30 @@ void test_array_map_batch_ops(void) CHECK(total_success == 0, "check total_success", "unexpected failure\n"); - printf("%s:PASS\n", __func__); - free(keys); free(values); free(visited); } + +static void array_map_batch_ops(void) +{ + __test_map_lookup_and_update_batch(false); + printf("test_%s:PASS\n", __func__); +} + +static void array_percpu_map_batch_ops(void) +{ + __test_map_lookup_and_update_batch(true); + printf("test_%s:PASS\n", __func__); +} + +void test_array_map_batch_ops(void) +{ + nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus(); + + CHECK(nr_cpus < 0, "nr_cpus checking", + "error: get possible cpus failed"); + + array_map_batch_ops(); + array_percpu_map_batch_ops(); +} -- 2.25.1