Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp2484114pxy; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:48:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxL0VaqUy+eM08CRI+4c03TJFvsmUStWhJESYnBQZtHjMCAcuTs53LIscNAMv6Z+FBcDPBm X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:28c9:: with SMTP id p9mr11697558ejd.111.1619311730616; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:48:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619311730; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iGkt3epO4SP+S7wQaY3Kmgxv964GnTqt4DC5lWpy/sr+L9uzESkAImTKnzff14nPFJ 4ydmAcx+ZSv92Edo8cNgYSpzbWLfREdNfbfY6bY7iv3S3J2Kb4kqUCWCZCZAwU6x3G/8 nZNHC358oSxE1jBLgLO6v+hr9fwuLOZdFi+5TE8jfe52QF/F9qo/1y0ybVXkPn9eWiNq HijW9VycG6cQQ4ReGut/ZBMNss4ac96zfdiTm0fYJ3O/opQeeadX2vxlucxVyqRKfvMe 6FMqHELx7cgV5pWGH9PFcW650gR4Z04UEh3ZaisJEuZZcZKwxZVNVTlV6jZ/w3So/5Br OKyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=5pawa+SZFixAQNTJM4LuxQhT6hdG+H0NF3QNxIV7/8Q=; b=Fw2z58SmcqSHE3G9qWpbuUozKUjyamrS27t3KkNSWn1y60TDyyGbrKZcSXBNquJw5g Sd58lNlIPYzJ6xLWqMcSpcKQ5hPASp/7k5VGn0zpdzcOeXlS8+s8FpSuv4Zf80TpxjgS zKIKOLs3SbPx3Om2ZnyurvdNtA5TaD+OQ91482BUoQT5WNnCqZCjAxgvFyeqvrrTBrsA /GHKby2TGH5Nept7d17+jpf0cXg/tFlkMMoa+T2AWe0SrLAdtzOakTEo4oheKJesd8P1 ZX5c/NxiI+Nf0qc2xe7BkwJoD0aPapwMtB6GWqrTvqaegei4IazKQP0/LX/VJIL1BvWT 4UHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=XkvpZaFu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e26si10463878edv.198.2021.04.24.17.48.27; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=XkvpZaFu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229778AbhDYAsR (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:48:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44814 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229695AbhDYAsR (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:48:17 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2FCF613C4; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 00:47:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1619311658; bh=mijs84e9TdAULlSFMzEsjGetGLdyir4mZ+ORmJUQPxw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XkvpZaFuiMXZxiAo7kTJH47fZSBRkvK4MeVbZuQZVnqR3facBiY/7U1yUxzzSmpw6 H6hN9sTuGUSinznQNiywDO6aIwjvnONqO4pn7AfL5me9xUF7rA99Je7yW4rTWgeEYe w8Zde1WJ7tySt5Oc3+DtfOOoKebLD8I6kf1lTHMwmikfQ277dA0NVLLziGeZokRfZN AqNbLcMnvEQKNrOzTZ0/71I0tqc9yD3OkB617y9Th5AIL63JgwSidgKJIW74UmCt/s zGFAI3V364zr5zNBaFkFJkYBUy0+mCEv5HGMDVxKtRi+WVa5GBluTIihP4miMChqOR +D9aZGoWXwSlw== Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:47:36 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chao@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: compress: remove unneed check condition Message-ID: References: <20210421083941.66371-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> <2c6f17e6-ef23-f313-5df2-6bd63d7df2b1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2c6f17e6-ef23-f313-5df2-6bd63d7df2b1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/22, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/4/22 12:04, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 04/21, Chao Yu wrote: > > > In only call path of __cluster_may_compress(), __f2fs_write_data_pages() > > > has checked SBI_POR_DOING condition, and also cluster_may_compress() > > > has checked CP_ERROR_FLAG condition, so remove redundant check condition > > > in __cluster_may_compress() for cleanup. > > > > I think cp_error can get any time without synchronization. Is it safe to say > > it's redundant? > > Yes, > > But no matter how late we check cp_error, cp_error can happen after our > check points, it won't cause regression if we remove cp_error check there, > because for compress write, it uses OPU, it won't overwrite any existed data > in device. > > Seems it will be more appropriate to check cp_error in > f2fs_write_compressed_pages() like we did in f2fs_write_single_data_page() > rather than in __cluster_may_compress(). > > BTW, shouldn't we rename __cluster_may_compress() to > cluster_beyond_filesize() for better readability? f2fs_cluster_has_data()? > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > > > --- > > > fs/f2fs/compress.c | 5 ----- > > > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c > > > index 3c9d797dbdd6..532c311e3a89 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c > > > @@ -906,11 +906,6 @@ static bool __cluster_may_compress(struct compress_ctx *cc) > > > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !page); > > > - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) > > > - return false; > > > - if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING))) > > > - return false; > > > - > > > /* beyond EOF */ > > > if (page->index >= nr_pages) > > > return false; > > > -- > > > 2.29.2 > > . > >