Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:18:31 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, dino@in.ibm.com,
       menage@google.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       mbligh@google.com, rohitseth@google.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Cpuset: explicit dynamic sched domain control flags
Message-Id: <20061019011831.549d00c6.pj@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061019011546.39c7a8df.pj@sgi.com>
References: <20061016230351.19049.29855.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com>
	<20061017114306.A19690@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
	<20061017121823.e6f695aa.pj@sgi.com>
	<20061017190144.A19901@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
	<20061018000512.1d13aabd.pj@sgi.com>
	<45371D96.8060003@yahoo.com.au>
	<20061019000303.f9d883e4.pj@sgi.com>
	<453732CF.7050801@yahoo.com.au>
	<20061019011546.39c7a8df.pj@sgi.com>
Organization: SGI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 715
Lines: 18

pj, responding to Nick:
> > But please don't let *users* try to deal with it.
> 
> Agreed - that's why I am about to send a patch that removes
> the sched domain side affects of the cpu_exclusive flag.

And Andrew has already pulled this "explicit dynamid sched
domain control flag" patch, at my request.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/