Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:03:11 +0000
From: andrew@walrond.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: make headers_install headers problem on sparc64
Message-ID: <20061019090311.GA17882@pelagius.h-e-r-e-s-y.com>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20061018223713.GD9350@pelagius.h-e-r-e-s-y.com> <1161244222.3376.470.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1161244222.3376.470.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1404
Lines: 40

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:50:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> Hm, yes. There's still a lot of crap being exposed there that we really
> don't need to be showing. Try this entirely untested patch...
> 
> The sparc64 version could do with something similar, too.
> 

I'm on sparc64 (pure 64bit) so I can't test your patch. For reference,
I used this (not as smart as yours) patch:

diff -Naur linux-2.6.18.1/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h linux-2.6.18.1-fix/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h
--- linux-2.6.18.1/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h    2006-09-20 03:42:06.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.18.1-fix/include/asm-sparc64/elf.h        2006-10-19 08:57:11.000000000 +0000
@@ -142,6 +142,7 @@
 #define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE         0x0000010000000000UL
 #endif

+#ifdef __KERNEL__

 /* This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what
    instruction set this cpu supports.  */
@@ -163,6 +164,8 @@

 #define ELF_HWCAP      sparc64_elf_hwcap();

+#endif
+
 /* This yields a string that ld.so will use to load implementation
    specific libraries for optimization.  This is more specific in
    intent than poking at uname or /proc/cpuinfo.  */


Andrew Walrond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/