Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp3604482pxy; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:48:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxk3WaDl+3xW6q0iJv1lVrLbntRys6LJ9zlJKMeDas3MZ0Lw2NvNv1OWztQ1wnmh1H0W77A X-Received: by 2002:a63:2d81:: with SMTP id t123mr10043037pgt.224.1619441330833; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:48:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619441330; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=buA5golmFvFIbTBkWYfCoqlMgE06/K4rtREE1vFEkfIVyNkb+SLJif+vD+J7xy5Wh0 bELlth3KnVyjXau6fTCGjV/WfqahDFmybxOGVaJ/U71W2itP/pCtxMjquSBdX5wg4PES s4CTNHI9CwYWd6KTT48VF4aD+wtmJLmRWTxVodavw/F9f+LKtlakCqiSWpDZaESmUZg0 u77BVE8XnrzlsILjf4Zh8aKRj0ir5wxrAdlWcjsdDuaSJq7cswxK8zJGLn9Npt2aHI+o vQAvyrDfJYj+7yEWtYOvesAgsLgCbjK1ieyVXq4vRnd+JhkNfLoawyQ4TeJ1y8znifyK +t2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=nQdCHOe62bXCUObB7ftv9+tjr7VJYbLJGJoCLuz1X7U=; b=Ds1WjjAioWpoKjUKvQK0yO9s3be7AIdh+7AhEqUFNtNcmehlROKWiIhxerGm6ZQ/m6 kFylsf+5l/3/gl8EsPM6jB43J6+4qON+nmyzC1OvBgfGzixJNHkk2jmNq0doRD0rD4xM t8Y9mKJ4rF3EDqkQJ7g1oQoIHONmfT2yxhsTvZNdW4lhwg5t0Z41uxVVWcRBDwNS/jNW GOarUW2wQMd1x7unnFjdsnnEVNTrcKF+vgb5WtnVBTQDvPcH84v2MXMs8SVlMtYqGXSh 08jF8TwgbIjoZfcrlWhKYk1jBN06WPMGIhh8XnT9CWmbHMg/WjhBrZJwWqZmvP7DwGC9 9SmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=gIfl832S; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a6si18423222pgw.531.2021.04.26.05.48.38; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=gIfl832S; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233218AbhDZMsc (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:48:32 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:47256 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233227AbhDZMsb (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:48:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1619441269; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nQdCHOe62bXCUObB7ftv9+tjr7VJYbLJGJoCLuz1X7U=; b=gIfl832STN6x5gPbawlHeVhhCz9MncUgLxtzmcBT0TUJSKBjqNcbXvgns6FTvpg1pFicN7 +TtRpuhjoDJl4BnSjkOmPBilC5p9liH7W0DBYqI6Hpc3MkorznIbJHKpZRTd1foFF9onPa J8e5iLikqCL9FPl3UtaXWuTci5zZBtI= Received: from mail-ej1-f69.google.com (mail-ej1-f69.google.com [209.85.218.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-236-Zvu3xgiqOU6Gtf3NPYPGzQ-1; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:47:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Zvu3xgiqOU6Gtf3NPYPGzQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f69.google.com with SMTP id f15-20020a170906738fb029037c94426fffso10171564ejl.22 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:47:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=nQdCHOe62bXCUObB7ftv9+tjr7VJYbLJGJoCLuz1X7U=; b=CqWt+YOep5veSnugvN4ZriKEJ5qtcA7zlKiBJw6tE1yZk4haZmy1ukLPh5QjO+/Sn/ 9do/Jjg9RAZ3Bo8BY9ARLbVRImazq4euKonzfmJbnEkl1YHWjyCLPoC+bwbrO422f0y6 T7WXssYHkdX4zGx++nK/w1ay7xiHWmRGJ1DBkNB5l4wB/l/viUIHPQyShjxsvmJhnz+F IAWRb6gHaZ8emstDrSvetlUnj1ZSFDAgE2JxRs4eHNWzQYAxET8Ih3yNP9juxiXoPbqz Y+7K1cMQO/kXGPDBL35415a5UdTU+Mw5GfgUew4p/uG2qpWwgWX3iYR6c7JRAnF3lUBI uuJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HozamvdVgAMMK9mEHUT0Rg3YwvsQgHZkYxQRIh9p2vEYalYMz v99mdYYL8usGvG5GUsuNmbvwzA2r1214ynUMoS1OtcFG0KhP7JW1aWtmUyYuOziwJLsLPaTl2eG gyFKqDtrIBwFeLIsWKYjvFCHu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1393:: with SMTP id b19mr20816401edv.333.1619441266030; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:47:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1393:: with SMTP id b19mr20816383edv.333.1619441265862; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vitty.brq.redhat.com (g-server-2.ign.cz. [91.219.240.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm4146619edq.67.2021.04.26.05.47.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 05:47:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Rong Chen , kernel test robot Cc: Paolo Bonzini , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, xudong.hao@intel.com Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [KVM] 4fc096a99e: kernel-selftests.kvm.set_memory_region_test.fail In-Reply-To: <41d6e208-1cc5-9633-fda2-232a9156a824@intel.com> References: <20210423032514.GB13944@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <871rb1h63v.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <41d6e208-1cc5-9633-fda2-232a9156a824@intel.com> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:47:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87bla1fc0f.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rong Chen writes: > On 4/23/21 2:23 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> kernel test robot writes: >> >>> Greeting, >>> >>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): >>> >>> commit: 4fc096a99e01dd06dc55bef76ade7f8d76653245 ("KVM: Raise the >>> maximum number of user memslots") >> ... >> >>> # selftests: kvm: set_memory_region_test >>> # Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions >>> # Allowed number of memory slots: 32764 >>> # Adding slots 0..32763, each memory region with 2048K size >>> # >>> not ok 32 selftests: kvm: set_memory_region_test # TIMEOUT 120 seconds >> This is a timeout, it can be raised in >> 'tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings'. I assume the test is running in >> a VM? >> > > Hi Vitaly, > > It's running in a physical Haswell machine. > Ok, let's try to speed up the test. I'll send a patch. -- Vitaly